Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,712 of 3,261    |
|    peterwezeman@hotmail.com to bob    |
|    Re: Cleveland Union Termainl Locomotives    |
|    03 Apr 15 17:40:40    |
      On Saturday, March 21, 2015 at 12:21:01 PM UTC-5, bob wrote:       > On 2015-03-21 01:00:17 +0000, peterwezeman@hotmail.com said:       >        > > I came across pictures of these locomotives, which were used to take        > > passenger trains in and out of the Cleveland Union Terminal when local        > > ordinance did not allow steaming within the city limits:       > >        > > http://morphotoarchive.org/rvndb/rvnjpeg_img_rec.php?objno=RVN10359       > >        > > After the war, when diesels replaced steam locomotives, they were no        > > longer needed in Cleveland. The New York Central then had them modified        > > to run off its third rail system and used them to pull trains in and        > > out of Grand Central Station.       > >        > > I find it interesting that the locomotive's superstructure is so much        > > shorter than the undercarriage, about two-thirds the length. I would be        > > interested in any information about why they were designed like this.       >        > An interesting photograph, thanks for posting.       >        > Electric locomotives of that era were heavy but not bulky. This meant        > that while they required lots of axles to support the weight, there        > wasn't that much actual volume required to be filled with it. A lot of        > electric locomotives of the 1920s and 1930s had relatively short bodies        > on much longer frames. The "Crocodile" pattern is something of a        > classic (google for Ce 6/8). The GG1, under its elegant streamlined        > body, is in many ways similar. With improvements in technology        > post-war weights went down, so the number of axles was reduced        > significantly, leading to much more compact machines.       >        > Robin              My thanks to all who replied. I conclude from the various comments that a       locomotive like the Cleveland Union Terminal units, operating off 3,000 volts       DC, needed a lot less electrical machinery on board than did for example a GG1       using 25 hz AC at much        higher voltage, and so needed less space to house it, hence the shorter       superstructure.              Peter Wezeman       anti-social Darwinist              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca