Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,633 of 3,261    |
|    Nick Fotis to conklin    |
|    Re: An another oil train fire in Norther    |
|    10 Mar 15 23:11:18    |
      From: nick.fotis@gmail.com              On 10/03/2015 02:00, conklin wrote:              > The article all but says that the "new" standards do not work either. Is       > there any proven design which might work at reasonable speeds?       >              I do not think it is practically possible - the kinetic energy involved       in a derailment of a loaded oil train is very high.       Even if you made double-hulled oil cans, like the double-hulled tanker       ships, that wouldn't guarantee you will get no puncture.              Maybe (just maybe) the gasses inside the crude oil tend to pressure the       oil tanks too much, and escape at the slightest opportunity? Maybe the       domes of these cars should be enlarged, offering more room for expansion?              The best idea is to avoid these derailments, in my opinion.       If that means shorter oil trains (= smaller forces) or lower speeds, I       don't know. And track maintenance is important, of course.              N.F.              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca