Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,537 of 3,261    |
|    bob to Marc Van Dyck    |
|    Re: Grade Crossing Safety    |
|    15 Feb 15 12:20:08    |
      From: rcp27g@gmail.com              On 2015-02-13 20:23:01 +0000, Marc Van Dyck said:              > rcp27g@gmail.com explained on 13-02-15 :       >       >> or putting in positive singalling control on others (ie where the       >> crossing is protected by railway signals that aren't cleared for the       >> train until the barriers are down and the crossing positively checked       >> to be clear).       >       > This is perfectly feasable but requires to order the gates to go down       > at a distance that is longer than the braking distance of the train.       > This means there will be a long delay between the gate going down and       > the train actually passing the grade crossing.              Indeed, this is the case. It is less convenient but allows for       positive safety.              > As it has been mentioned,       > motorists are unpatient creatures; if the delay is too long, people       > think the gates are faulty and start turning around them. You might end       > up this way with a grade crossing that is inherently less safe, because       > of human nature...              Solved by making the barriers block the whole road. As the crossing is       positively checked to ensure the barriers are down and the crossing is       clear before clearing the signals for the trains, the issue of cars       being trapped within the crossing is avoided.              The usual design in the UK, for example, is for the road to be blocked       by four barriers: each covering half the roadway on each side of the       railway. The warning lights/klaxon start first, then the "entry" side       barriers come down, then the "exit" side barriers come down, then the       klaxon stops (it gets irritating, and once the barriers are down, is       redundant). Then the crossing is checked to be clear, either by a       person in a local signal box or by CCTV cameras, and if it is clear,       the signals are cleared for the train or trains passing. It is safe,       but means waits at the crossing can be a couple of minutes before the       train actually arrives. The crossing sequence is initiated by the       signalman, who can keep the crossing down if there are multiple trains.        They can be annoying, but they are safe.              Not all crossings in the UK are of this sort, there are also "automatic       half-barrier" crossings that do not block the whole road and are       triggered automatically by the train approaching, without positive       safety, but designed for the minimum road-closed time, so the barriers       come down about 20s before the train arrives. Such a crossing was       involved in the Ufton Nervet crash, and they are only used on quiet       roads with little traffic, and on railway lines with lower speeds.              Robin              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca