Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,536 of 3,261    |
|    peterwezeman@hotmail.com to hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com    |
|    Re: Grade Crossing Safety    |
|    14 Feb 15 21:32:20    |
      On Friday, February 13, 2015 at 2:56:43 PM UTC-6, hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:       > On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 1:02:46 PM UTC-5, peterw...@hotmail.com       wrote:       >        > > 1. In designing the iconic FT freight locomotive and E series passenger       locomotives, Electromotive put a hood-like structure on the front specifically       to give some protection to the engineer and fireman in the event of a       collision at a grade crossing,        and virtually all subsequent American locomotives have continued this       practice. Is there any requirement for grade-crossing protection on       self-propelled motor unit passenger cars?       >        > Yes, extensive high-strength protection against collisions.       >        >        > > 2. In the accounts I've read, the lead unit on the Metro North train was       set on fire by gasoline from the fuel tank of the Mercedes Benz SUV. Barring       the few battery powered cars in service, every vehicle hit at a grade crossing       has a fuel tank; in        the case of a semi truck there might be as much as three hundred gallons of       diesel oil onboard. Does the design of a locomotive or motor unit incorporate       any protection from this?       >        > Short of hitting a fuel truck, this kind of fire is unusual in grade       crossing accidents. Usually the vehicle is just crushed or pushed aside and       does not catch fire.       >        >        >        > > With modern welded rail track, broken rails are a known and feared failure       mode.        >        > They are? I thought welded rail reduced the incidence of broken rails.       >        > Also, I don't believe third rail is welded, plus it is very rare for it to       break.       >        > In any event, a broken rail would disrupt the signal current, causing the       block to go red.              Welded rail is laid down in the warmer part of the year and, when it gets       colder, it is prevented from contracting thermally by a system of rail anchors       clipped to the bottom flange of the rail and bearing against the ties. In       winter, rail can be in a        state of tensile stress of several tens of thousands pounds per square inch.       In normal use rail is subject to cycles of stress as trains move along it, and       the resulting metal fatigue can result in cracking. If a crack reaches       so-called "Griffith length"        when the rail is in tension the crack becomes self propagating and spreads       through the remaining depth of the rail in a fraction of a second, leaving a       dangerous gap in the broken rail. Railroads employ a variety of magnetic and       ultrasonic scanning        machines to detect cracks before they reach Griffith length. If cracks are       found, they are removed by grinding or milling down the upper bearing surface       of the rail, which also serves to restore its correct profile. I believe that       at least occasionally        rolling stock has been impaled by the broken end of a rail.              Peter Wezeman       anti-social Darwinist               --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca