Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,383 of 3,261    |
|    hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to Stephen Sprunk    |
|    Re: NEC future report    |
|    14 Nov 14 10:51:42    |
      On Friday, November 14, 2014 1:15:29 PM UTC-5, Stephen Sprunk wrote:              > Indeed, and that's one of the reasons why Amtrak's NEC service is one of       > the biggest "airlines" in the country. However, conservatives hate       > Amtrak; they'd rather spend ten times as much money on airports that       > benefit far fewer people. After all, it's not _their_ money.              Recently, they added another widened section (12 lanes) to the NJ Tpk. In       looking at the big picture, what is sad is that while they've invested tons of       money into the turnpike and airports, much of the NEC remains stuck in 1930 or       even 1900 technology.         We're using the same two tunnels under the Hudson as built 100 years ago.        Ok, they're upgrading a segment for faster speeds, but it's very short       compared to the total length between NYC and DC.              We all know damn well that efforts to make Amtrak "efficeint" and       "transparent" are just cover-ups to hobble Amtrak and reduce the qualtiy of       service, such as the Congressional demand to ruin on board food service.        Sadly, the pundits blame Amtrak even        though it was Congress who mandated it.              The kicker is that an improved NYC rail network would alleviate bottlenecks in       highways and airways              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca