Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,255 of 3,261    |
|    Adam H. Kerman to hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com    |
|    Re: NJT emergency phone number disconnec    |
|    28 Aug 14 22:51:34    |
      From: ahk@chinet.com              hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:       >On Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:59:34 PM UTC-4, mrob...@att.net wrote:              >>I didn't think this mattered anymore for toll-free numbers, but I recall       >>when companies used to advertise a 1-800 number for all states but the       >>one where they were located, and then either a regular phone number or a       >>different 1-800 number for use within their state only. I assume this       >>was an attempt to save money, or possibly a consequence of how long       >>distance calls used to work.              >Years ago, there were different regulations for in-state and       >out-of-state calls.              There were no regulations to this effect. It was strictly for the convenience       of AT&T billing. See my other followup.              >It is more likely that, if the number is still in service, that it was a       >glitch by my cellphone carrier.              They used to re-direct toll free calls to the ILEC to handle; no idea       what happens today. I don't even know if the database still lives in St. Louis.              >By the way, I would've tried reporting it using a pay phone, but they       >were recently all removed.              Of course they were. Don't want to have any in case of emergency.              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca