From: calvin@remove.daxack.ca   
      
   Adam H. Kerman (ahk@chinet.com) said...   
   >   
   >As you've chosen to engage in selective quoting, you can go fuck   
   >yourself. This portion of the thread was about the possible theory of how   
   >the engineer might be prosecuted for criminal wrongdoing, not liability   
   >for the railroad.   
   >   
   >The rest of your crap is snipped unread.   
      
   Editing asshole of the year award goes to Adam H. Kerman.   
      
   My point started with how the charges of criminal wrongdoing on the   
   part of the employee ought not stand up and that not even civil   
   liability would hold up. The charges are for show, but unfortunately   
   the accused has to defend against such charges.   
      
   --   
   Calvin Henry-Cotnam   
   "Unusual or extreme reactions to events caused by negligence   
    are imaginable, but not reasonably foreseeable"   
     - Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, May 2008   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)