From: ahk@chinet.com   
      
   Calvin Henry-Cotnam  wrote:   
   >Adam H. Kerman (ahk@chinet.com) said...   
      
   >>He still had to return in time to check that the consist was being held;   
   >>the brakes wouldn't hold forever, given the insufficient number of manually   
   >>set brakes. So it's his behavior throughout the incident.   
      
   >The question that the court will have to deal with is whether he BELIEVED   
   >that the number of manual brakes that he set were sufficient. If so, then   
   >liability falls on those (the company) who made him believe that.   
      
   As you've chosen to engage in selective quoting, you can go fuck   
   yourself. This portion of the thread was about the possible theory of how   
   the engineer might be prosecuted for criminal wrongdoing, not liability   
   for the railroad.   
      
   The rest of your crap is snipped unread.   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)