Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,034 of 3,261    |
|    John Albert to dpeltier@my-deja.com    |
|    Re: Why no official report on Lac Megant    |
|    14 Jul 14 12:21:50    |
      From: j.albert@snet.net              On 7/12/14 10:37 PM, dpeltier@my-deja.com wrote:       >> You may counter that the "proper test" would be for the engineman to go       >> >back to the cab, release all all, and see if the train moved. He              > I certainly wouldn't say that. That doesn't sound very practical at all as       > a general rule, for the reasons you give and some others too              The procedure I described above is EXACTLY how Amtrak       specifies the crew to "test" the brakes to see if the train       is secured against movement.              That is:       1. Apply hand brakes       2. Release train and engine air brakes       3. Ascertain if the train moves. If it does...       4. Apply -more- hand brakes and re-test as before.              The train is considered "secure" if all air brakes are       released, and train doesn't move.              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca