From: ahk@chinet.com   
      
   John Albert  wrote:   
   >On 7/11/14 7:41 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
      
   >>Damn. You're suggesting it could be sabotage.   
      
   >No, not "sabotage" at all. . . .   
      
   All right.   
      
   >Sorry for the long post.   
   >But that's the way I see it, and that's the way I'm callin' it.   
      
   I really appreciate the explanation as to how the pneumatics work.   
   Thank you.   
      
   >I could be wrong.   
   >But this report should have been out months ago.   
   >What's holding it up?   
      
   You're absolutely right. The report should be out, especially if it   
   supports the theory of the prosecution. If it doesn't support the   
   theory of the prosecution, why haven't charges been withdrawn?   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)