Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    PYTHON    |    Support for the Python language    |    96 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 41 of 96    |
|    Rick Christian to Rich Lawrence    |
|    Is there a JAM library?    |
|    23 Nov 16 07:28:00    |
       Hello Rich!              22 Nov 16 08:09, you wrote to me:               RL> I'm sticking to 2.x but I'll check it out and may get some insight on        RL> how to do some things.              Yeah.. I don't use 3.x either... I really don't understand the reason for the       breakage casued in the 3.x branch... I know some stuff I do, would need       rewritten as would stuff I use that need the same, and for some of that its       abandonware so...               RL> on the documentation. I read the JAM stuff and my mind melts. I just        RL> can't wrap my head around binary file manipulation... yet! Never give        RL> up! Never Surrender!              Well I avoided a lot of things, succesfully for a LONG time.. C and Python       being two of them...              Python came back as for some stuff I do on Pi's its a must              C was a forced thing for a more recent issue... now its sort of a mission for       something...                      RL> Yes I do. I'm trying to code a CNet BBS clone in Python and make it        RL> more modern on the backend. I figured JAM would be easy for fido/FTN              Well hopefully the one helps, its 2.x...              I know I would love to have a python Jam lib so I could test some ideas... but       the posted JHR reader might just be the test suite I need.. since thats really       all I need to read anyway, at least in theory.                      RL> OK, good to know! Thank you!              This came up else where with some stuff that is written for a tosser and       NNTP/Fido server all by the same author..              The issue is variable size at least from what I can see right now... I don't       know if there is a way to typedef ulong to be unsigned 32bit interger v. it       defaulting to 64b when compiled on a 64b systems or not.. forcing gcc to 32b       mode seems to resolve it.. but I just have a bug about doing that... I would       rather have a 64b binary, that uses 32b variables....              Is there no longer a "C" echo????? Didn't see one in the list I have, but maybe        its not exhaustive???                     Rick                     ... Ding Dong the Witch is DEAD! I Made America Great Again! President Trump!       --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160322        * Origin: Vina's Talos Moon Base Alpha (1:135/377)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca