MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet 09155d96   
   REPLY: 2:280/464 647b5583   
   PID: OpenXP/5.0.57 (Win32)   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   TZUTC: -0400   
   Hello Wilfred!   
      
    AA>> Oh yeah.. netmail could work that way exclusively. Good   
    AA>> point. That could be reasonably invisible to the NSA/spy.   
    AA>>  But the use of the binkp can still be deteted, no?   
      
    WvV> Yes. With or without pgp/gpg content.   
      
   Hmmm..  Too bad networked (via FTN) BBSes don't stress that     
   opaqueness as pretty-good-isolation from internet collection     
   then.   
      
      
    AA>> And if that's the case, they can start focusing their   
    AA>> observations on systems that use it and probe deeper.   
      
    WvV> Why would they want to do that? And if they would, they   
    WvV> would have already started doing so decades ago...   
      
   Well.. I thought that if it becomes known that BBSes are the     
   transport mechanism for secret/suspect messages, then the spys     
   could investigate the BBS and owners and choose to knock on     
   their doors some day?   
      
      
   --    
     ../|ug   
      
   --- OpenXP 5.0.57   
    * Origin: What do you call an excavated pyramid? Unencrypted. (2:221/1.58)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 123/131   
   SEEN-BY: 124/5016 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 215 700   
   SEEN-BY: 218/720 840 850 860 880 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111 292/854 8125   
   SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 423/81 120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1   
   PATH: 221/1 280/464 103/705 218/700 229/426