Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    PUBLIC_KEYS    |    Public-Key Discussion Echo    |    845 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 500 of 845    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to August Abolins    |
|    Re: not encrypted, but still needs decod    |
|    10 Jan 20 09:24:51    |
      TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815       RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes       TZUTC: 0100       CHRS: UTF-8 2       PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221       MSGID: 2:280/464 5e1834d4       REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet e0411c85       Hi August,              On 2020-01-09 18:50:00, you wrote to me:               WvV>> Below is my reply to your message. It's *not encrypted* only signed        WvV>> (but not clearsigned). Anyone with gpg can decode it and view it's        WvV>> contents               AA> [snip]               WvV>> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----        WvV>> Version: GnuPG v2               WvV>> owGbwMvMwMRovbl2hdf0ydqMaxlNk7jS83NSUlP0covT48Qnf/DIVHAsTS8tLtHh        WvV>> 4vLPUzAyMDLQNTDUNbBUMDKyMja3MjDVUajML1UoL8ovSVUoyVfITbXi4lKws1Nw                      AA> An "only signed" message produces what still looks encrypted.               AA> Maybe we are being too loose with the terminology.               AA> Maybe we should say, just signing a message *encodes* it.              I'm already trying to do that. "Ascii encoding" is not the same as       "Encrypting" ! ;)                     Bye, Wilfred.              --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815        * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832       SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757       SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250       PATH: 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca