home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   PUBLIC_KEYS      Public-Key Discussion Echo      845 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 432 of 845   
   Wilfred van Velzen to August Abolins   
   Re: won't be signing every message   
   07 Jan 20 11:32:08   
   
   TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221   
   MSGID: 2:280/464 5e145fcf   
   REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet e029173b   
   Hi August,   
      
   On 2020-01-06 19:13:00, you wrote to me:   
      
    WvV>> I think almost 6 million isn't a small number. Almost 1 in every   
    WvV>> 1000 earth human has one. ;)   
      
    WvV>> On the other hand. Almost every one with a key has more than 1. (Like   
    WvV>> Tommy's 18 ;))   
      
    AA> Right, so that reduces the estimate a bit.  And if you factor in the keys   
    AA> that are expired or revoked, the number may be significantly less.   
      
   Probably only half or even less...   
      
    AA>>> Some aspects of business-2-business are ripe for pgp.   
      
    WvV>> You don't have to convince me. ;)   
      
    AA> I'v read about S/MIME type encryption methods that use certificates. And   
    AA> these certificates are created and registered with an "authority". When I   
    AA> was looking for something to use with MS Outlook for business, I only came   
    AA> across solutions that required payment.   
      
    AA> Maybe big-business environments use the above solution.   
      
   That's probably the same thing as the certificates used in ssl/tls ip trafic   
   (https:). And indeed those cost money if you want one from the commercial   
   "authority"'s and don't want to use Letsencrypt.   
      
    AA> But PGP management is much simpler and gives total angency to the   
    AA> user.   
      
    AA> I am a little surprised pgp is not more ubiquitous as it *should* be.   
      
    AA> What type of business is/was your involvement?   
      
   Nothing (official)... Why would you think that? ;)   
      
   But I have developed/used pgp signing solutions for distributing software to   
   linux embeded systems.   
      
      
   Bye, Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832   
   SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250   
   PATH: 280/464 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca