Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    PUBLIC_KEYS    |    Public-Key Discussion Echo    |    845 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 432 of 845    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to August Abolins    |
|    Re: won't be signing every message    |
|    07 Jan 20 11:32:08    |
      TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815       RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes       TZUTC: 0100       CHRS: UTF-8 2       PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221       MSGID: 2:280/464 5e145fcf       REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet e029173b       Hi August,              On 2020-01-06 19:13:00, you wrote to me:               WvV>> I think almost 6 million isn't a small number. Almost 1 in every        WvV>> 1000 earth human has one. ;)               WvV>> On the other hand. Almost every one with a key has more than 1. (Like        WvV>> Tommy's 18 ;))               AA> Right, so that reduces the estimate a bit. And if you factor in the keys        AA> that are expired or revoked, the number may be significantly less.              Probably only half or even less...               AA>>> Some aspects of business-2-business are ripe for pgp.               WvV>> You don't have to convince me. ;)               AA> I'v read about S/MIME type encryption methods that use certificates. And        AA> these certificates are created and registered with an "authority". When I        AA> was looking for something to use with MS Outlook for business, I only came        AA> across solutions that required payment.               AA> Maybe big-business environments use the above solution.              That's probably the same thing as the certificates used in ssl/tls ip trafic       (https:). And indeed those cost money if you want one from the commercial       "authority"'s and don't want to use Letsencrypt.               AA> But PGP management is much simpler and gives total angency to the        AA> user.               AA> I am a little surprised pgp is not more ubiquitous as it *should* be.               AA> What type of business is/was your involvement?              Nothing (official)... Why would you think that? ;)              But I have developed/used pgp signing solutions for distributing software to       linux embeded systems.                     Bye, Wilfred.              --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815        * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832       SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757       SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250       PATH: 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca