TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221   
   MSGID: 2:280/464 5e1452bc   
   REPLY: 2:221/360.0 5e13c4e2   
   Hi August,   
      
   On 2020-01-07 01:38:14, you wrote to me:   
      
    WvV>> You could do some tests, sending encrypted and non-   
    WvV>> encrypted routed netmails through the net. But you will   
    WvV>> have to find volunteer destinations in all far away corners   
    WvV>> of the nodelist. ;)   
      
    AA> For starters, the ENC flag seems to be flown in Z2 systems only.   
      
   Your right. Strange... Maybe they are filtered from the segments before they   
   make it in the published nodelist?   
      
    AA> So, it is unlikely that anyone in Z1 would like to participate.   
      
   I wouldn't draw that conclusion just from what is in the nodelist. ;)   
      
    AA> But it could be interesting which non-ENC systems let the messages   
    AA> pass through.   
      
   That's the whole purpose of the test: Find out which systems on "all" possible   
   routes still filter/bounce encrypted netmail.   
      
    AA> Nah.. best to stick with known systems that show ENC.   
      
   It isn't the destinations we are testing but the systems along the routes...   
      
   Bye, Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832   
   SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250   
   PATH: 280/464 229/426