MSGID: 2:221/360.0 5e122902   
   REPLY: 2:280/464 5e11d291   
   PID: JamNNTPd/OS2 1.3 20191208   
   TID: GE/2 1.2   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   On 05/01/2020 7:11 a.m., Wilfred van Velzen : August Abolins wrote:   
      
    WvV> If they can verify the signature is really made by who you   
    WvV> claim you are! It would be even better, because it's easier to   
    WvV> create a false hand written signature.   
      
   Written signatures (that are not witnessed) are useless really. When my   
   debit machine spews out a receipt with "Signature required", the person   
   can easily put anything there.  Often I just get a scribble.   
      
   However, I think the understanding in the industry is that for starters,   
   I wouldn't have that debit machine unless my true identity was verified.   
   And since I am a "registered" operator of the device, and rule is if I   
   give the receipt to the buyer to sign, then I did exactly that - as me   
   as a witness, and that my claim to authenticity trumps the buyer's claim   
   should they decide to deny they signed it.   
      
   Also, I should be probably checking that the scribble they put on the   
   receipt matches the scribble they have on the back of the card.   
      
   But sometimes, there is no sig on the card, or the user refuses to hand   
   it over, or they tell me it's a family card, or.. whatever.   
      
   For now, the sig on receipt requirement is only for foreign buyers.    
      
   PIN enabled or Contact-less enabled cards are gaining usage.   
      
      
   .../|ug   
      
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101    
   hunderbird/60.9.1   
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 19/10 90/1 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 227/114 229/426 1014   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 8125 317/3   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 335/364 342/200 423/81   
   PATH: 221/360 1 292/854 229/426