MSGID: 2:221/360.0 5e1204cc   
   REPLY: 2:280/464 5e11d0db   
   PID: JamNNTPd/OS2 1.3 20191208   
   TID: GE/2 1.2   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   On 1/5/2020 7:03 AM, between "Wilfred van Velzen : August Abolins":   
      
    AA>> Next to being able to sign messages in echomail/newsgroups,   
    AA>> fully encrypted messages only make sense in email - direct   
    AA>> to a specific individual.   
      
    WvV> Or routed netmail!   
      
   But we really don't know the exact route a netmail will take.   
      
   For a user, unless they analyze the nodelist or confirm things with   
   their sysop, netmail is unreliable.   
      
   I also use point-software (OpenXP) which allows sending crash mail. With   
   that, I could crash my encrypted netmail to its final destination with   
   confidence to any system that flies the U,ENC flags.   
      
      
    AA>> That's the beauty of pulling down the keys and checking   
    AA>> their properties. The properties will reveal creation   
    AA>> dates, expiry dates, revocations, etc. It would be   
    AA>> relatively easy to just pick the most recent date, and send   
    AA>> a brief hello message with a CC: and see which ones reach   
    AA>> their target.   
      
    WvV> If there are multiple keys to choose from...   
      
   Yeah, tracking people down from the past that have only one email addy   
   listed on the servers with an expired key could be a challenge.   
      
    ../|ug   
      
   --- Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)   
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 19/10 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 227/114 229/426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 712/848 770/1 2452/250   
   PATH: 221/360 1 280/464 229/426