Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    PUBLIC_KEYS    |    Public-Key Discussion Echo    |    845 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 381 of 845    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to August Abolins    |
|    Re: won't be signing every message    |
|    05 Jan 20 13:11:57    |
      TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815       RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes       TZUTC: 0100       CHRS: UTF-8 2       PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221       MSGID: 2:280/464 5e11d291       REPLY: 2:221/360.0 5e113718       Hi August,              On 2020-01-05 03:08:42, you wrote to me:               WvV>> Good to know it works. (But I won't be signing every        WvV>> message by default ;))               AA> Signing probably makes most sense for official content that contains        AA> specific data, dates, to register an official vote, etc.              Yes, it doesn't add too much in the mostly casual communication that goes on       in fidonet...               AA> The technology was probably only intended to be used in direct 1 to 1        AA> exchanges like email.              I don't think so. It also has it's function in public forums like fido's       echomail...               AA> Sometimes I get requests from vendors via email that require a        AA> confirmation for a particular agreement. There is a document that they        AA> request be signed. In the not too distant past, I would print the doc,        AA> add my signature, scan it, print it and fax it. Very time consuming.               AA> When the fax device died (pc usb type), I would take a pictures of the        AA> signed doc, copy the pic to the network and email the pic.               AA> Since then, I've learned to sign the pdf version of the doc and email it        AA> back.               AA> But a pgp signature would be even simpler and faster.              If they can verify the signature is really made by who you claim you are! It       would be even better, because it's easier to create a false hand written       signature.              Bye, Wilfred.              --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815        * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832       SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757       SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250       PATH: 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca