TZUTC: -0600   
   MSGID: 36854.fido_politics@1:124/5016 2d862707   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/bd2a60f59 Nov 02 2025 GCC 13.3.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.31-Linux master/bd2a60f59 Nov 02 2025 GCC 13.3.0   
   BBSID: EOTLBBS   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105   
      
   Trump has initiated a lawsuit against the former FBI chief. All to create   
   distractions from the Epstein files and failed economic policies.   
      
   This lawsuit is remarkable because it's being conducted by a prosecutor who   
   may not even be a prosecutor. Her appointment by the government may be illegal.   
      
   Moreover, she is completely inexperienced.   
      
   Not only that, but taking on this case required multiple prosecutors. In her   
   own district, not a single prosecutor was willing to take it on because they   
   considered the charges frivolous. A case like that for nothing can cost a   
   prosecutor a career. So she had to shop around, and in another district, there   
   were a few prosecutors who were willing to take it on.   
      
   To finalize the case, a grand jury had to approve the indictments. There were   
   three indictments. The grand jury approved two of the three.   
      
   Then you have to compile a new list of indictments that is fully supported by   
   the grand jury. The Trump-appointed, and possibly illegal, prosecutor didn't   
   do that, but merely removed the unaccepted indictment and forwarded that part   
   to the judge.   
      
   Not only that, but she also mistakenly sent the first indictment, containing   
   the three counts, to the judge.   
      
   That first indictment, containing the three counts, was therefore not accepted   
   by the grand jury. The second was never presented to the grand jury, which is   
   unheard of.   
      
   I don't see how this case can ever be taken seriously considering how clumsily   
   and stupidly constructed the entire case is. The grand jury may have approved   
   the two indictments, but the case itself is so shady, so flawed, that it could   
   never lead to a conviction, even if a judge were to accept all the   
   prosecutor's mistakes.   
      
   This costs enormous amounts of money and achieves absolutely nothing. How much   
   money can be allowed to continue to be spent in the US to distract from the   
   Epstein case?   
      
    .   
   --- SBBSecho 3.31-Linux   
    * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/0 5016 128/187   
   SEEN-BY: 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 610 700   
   SEEN-BY: 218/810 840 860 880 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 300 307   
   SEEN-BY: 229/317 400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512 280/464 291/111 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 902/26 5075/35   
   PATH: 124/5016 218/700 229/426