Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    POLITICS    |    Political Discussions    |    39,875 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 38,056 of 39,875    |
|    Kurt Weiske to Dan Clough    |
|    Re: YouTube pays Trump    |
|    04 Oct 25 09:27:32    |
      TZUTC: -0700       MSGID: 36756.politics@1:218/700 2d471088       REPLY: 19344.fido_politics@1:135/115 2d45a3e3       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/fbbbd4ad4 Aug 26 2025 MSC 1942       TID: SBBSecho 3.29-Win32 master/fbbbd4ad4 Aug 26 2025 MSC 1942       BBSID: REALITY       CHRS: CP437 2       FORMAT: flowed       -=> Dan Clough wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-               -=> Kurt Weiske wrote to Dan Clough <=-               KW> a media company looking to merge or continue to operate as a business        KW> sooner or later you'll be offered the opportunity to settle a        KW> frivolous        KW> lawsuit for cash and ansure a healthy return for your shareholders.               KW> Principles be damned.               DC> Two words:        DC> Hunter Biden.        DC> Game. Set. Match.               KW> Oh, thank you for a good laugh this morning - I needed that.               DC> Hey Kurt,               DC> How smart you are with your context-snipping. Tell me this - why did        DC> you trim/snip the line that I quoted RIGHT ABOVE where you *did* quote,        DC> above?               DC> The line that said: "Trump certainly has learned how to monetize the        DC> presidency."               DC> That's important because that's what my comment about Hunter Biden was        DC> in reference to. You knew that, and purposely snipped it, to        DC> (seemingly) remove the connection between "Hunter Biden" and        DC> "monetizing the Presidency".              Thank you for including that line. How do Hunter Biden and Jared Kushner       compare with regards to benefiting financially from having a president       in the family?               DC> Often, you are VERY lazy with your trimming, leaving entire paragraphs        DC> of irrelevant crap below your responses, and just sending it.               Yeah, that's a bad habit with my offline reader.               DC> case, though, you carefully/surgically trimmed things just right, in a        DC> blatant attempt to skew the context to prevent you from looking like an        DC> idiot. It failed, as it always does.              Game, Set and Match, Indeed!               DC> I'd be happy to hear your explanation as to why you snipped my post in        DC> that manner. You got the balls to answer that?              It's all part of a global conspiracy to make you look bad. Just because       you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you...               DC> Another question: You don't think Hunter Biden contributed to        DC> "monetizing the Presidency"? Come on, man up and actually answer a        DC> question, without deception or re-direction.              Man up? Got the balls?              Freud would have a field day with you.                             --- MultiMail/Win v0.52        * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)       SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187       SEEN-BY: 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 610 700       SEEN-BY: 218/810 840 860 880 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 300 307 317       SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512 291/111 292/854 301/1       SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26       SEEN-BY: 5075/35       PATH: 218/700 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca