home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   POLITICS      Political Discussions      39,875 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 37,748 of 39,875   
   Joseph Pereira to All   
   Who shot Charlie Kirk and why?   
   12 Sep 25 05:51:47   
   
   TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 35919.fido_politics@1:124/5016 2d29bd92   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/f820805f0 Aug 31 2025 GCC 13.3.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.29-Linux master/f820805f0 Aug 31 2025 GCC 13.3.0   
   BBSID: EOTLBBS   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105   
   According to the great connector, Trump, it was the far-left. The Democrats   
   did it. That much is clear. Some members of Trump's group also immediately   
   blamed the Democrats and/or the far-left.   
      
   Their reaction is quite comparable to the attack on the Reichstag. In   
   retrospect, that was a false flag, and the communists were immediately blamed.   
      
   Personally, I think we should look for the military angle. After all, this was   
   a highly organized assassination. Not only was the shot extremely difficult,   
   but the escape route was also apparently well-organized. Everything executed   
   with military precision.   
      
   A weapon was also left behind, leaving it to be found. That, of course, is a   
   wonderful way to throw the authorities off the scent.   
      
   In my view, there are two possible groups from which the perpetrator could   
   come: soldiers discharged because they are transgender, or soldiers who   
   recently lost family members to gun violence perpetrated by a right-wing   
   activist.   
      
   Charlie Kirk had recently said that deaths from gun violence were the price of   
   the freedom to bear arms. A price he considered worth it. Something like that   
   is, of course, a huge slap in the face when you've just lost a loved one to   
   gun violence.   
      
   The weapon found indicates it could have come from the transgender community.   
   That makes me think a family member of a recent victim of gun violence offers   
   a greater chance.   
      
   I'm pretty sure it was a former soldier anyway. So the link to "the left" is   
   possibly nonexistent. In my opinion, it's a disgrace that Trump and his gang   
   are playing the political card before the man was even cold. A truly shameful   
   thing.   
      
   You'd almost think it was a false flag. Charlie, who had to be sacrificed   
   because he became too much of a friend of the left and, in too many debates,   
   essentially showed that the left has a better narrative…   
      
   Had Charlie already lost his value to the Trump team? Were they afraid of this   
   new campaign that would prove them wrong all over the US?   
      
   Why couldn't it be that?   
      
   But if I had to put my money on it, I'd go for a relative of a recently   
   deceased victim. Someone with a military background would make the most sense.   
   A good hunter would also work, of course.   
      
    .   
   --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux   
    * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016)   
   SEEN-BY: 19/25 33 38 105/81 106/201 987 124/0 5016 128/187 129/14   
   SEEN-BY: 129/305 130/330 153/7715 154/110 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 320/219 322/757 342/200 387/18 25 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35   
   PATH: 124/5016 396/45 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca