TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A49   
   MSGID: 1:342/200 d6c2fb8d   
   REPLY: 1:120/616 c300a989   
   TZUTC: -0700   
   On 07 Sep 2025, Ron L. said the following...   
      
    RL>    
    RL> IHMO:  This is a play by Trump to show how the Fed is outside of the   
    RL> gov't and, therefore, unconstitutional.   
    RL>    
    RL> That will feed into the growing call to end the Fed.   
    RL>    
      
   I  know it's a win win... a 2-4 kind of deal.   
      
   IN recent times there was a guy born in the 1950s, was the son of an   
   ambassador or something related to that... and he lost his citizenship, after   
   70 years... I thought it was Trump testing Amendment 14's Birthright   
   Citizenship deal... The important part of the Amendment says...   
      
   :Start   
   All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the   
   jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state   
   wherein they reside.   
   :Stop   
      
   After the statement "All persons born or naturalized in the United States"   
   there is a comma a,d after that comma there is an additional statement... "and   
   subject to the jurisdiction thereof"... and this is the important part.   
      
   The case I was talking about the Supreme court ruled on it recently...and this   
   is what made me think this was done by Trump to fire a shot across the the bow   
   of Birthright Citizenship...   
      
   Why aren't Ambassador children born in the US not citizens... The case they   
   ruled on was not an Ambassador but rather he worked in the Embassy in some   
   manner and as a result this that 70++ YO lost his citizenship... His parents   
   are subject to the country the Embassy is attached to.   
      
   When you come to the country legally and are put through the riggers of   
   Naturalizing you'll be vetted and swear allegiance to the Constitution and the   
   Country itself.   
      
   It is this statement that they are putting their arguments on... If it was   
   just as simple as the Democrats are saying they would not have added that   
   comma and put "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" That means something   
   and the Supreme court should rule in Trump's favor.   
      
   IB Joe, Pronouns (FJB/LGB)    
   AKA Joe Schweier   
   SysOp of 4A 6F 65 73 42 42 53     
   -=JoesBBS.com=-   
      
   ... I wish life had a scroll-back buffer.   
      
   --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)   
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 700   
   SEEN-BY: 229/705 266/512 291/111 292/854 320/219 322/757 342/200 202   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35   
   PATH: 342/200 229/426