Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    POINTS    |    Point usage discussion and systems suppo    |    3,070 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 912 of 3,070    |
|    August Abolins to Martin Foster    |
|    [WinPoint] Templates annoyance    |
|    27 Apr 19 19:50:01    |
      MSGID: 2:221/1.59 66af4717       CHRS: IBMPC 2       TZUTC: 0400       REPLY: 2:310/31.3 5cc46bd7       Hello Martin,              On 27.04.19, you wrote to All:        MF> Hello All!               MF> It would appear that the message templates are only applied to echomail        MF> messages, none of them are applied to netmail messages.               MF> Anyone else seeing this behaviour?              Yep. If a Reply-in-Netmail were to be triggered from an echo, it would be       nice if there was a header that included the name of the originating echo, for       example.              In addition, a predefined signature also does not carry into a direct       Reply-in-Netmail. :(              Two more CONs.              Two bad we can't even Reply in the echo (utilizing the templates) and then       change the Area in the header. Once the reply is started in the echo, it is       locked for that Area (the Area drop-down is grey-out).                            ../|ug                                   --- WinPoint Beta 5 (359.1)        * Origin: Reluctantly Revisiting Fidonet (2:221/1.59)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 154/10 203/0 221/1 6 360 226/17 229/354 426 1014       SEEN-BY: 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3       SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 393/68 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250       PATH: 221/1 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca