home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   POINTS      Point usage discussion and systems suppo      3,070 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 564 of 3,070   
   August Abolins to mark lewis   
   trying to get the hang of "oxp"   
   03 Apr 19 09:09:11   
   
   MSGID: 2:221/360 5ca44e06   
   REPLY: 1:3634/12.73 5ca43551   
   PID: JamNNTPd/OS2 1.3 20190208   
   TID: GE/2 1.2   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   TZUTC: 0300   
   In a post between "mark lewis : August Abolins", on 4/3/2019 12:21 AM   
      
   >  AA> Next, I might look into the quoting options. By default it is just the   
   >  AA> ">" char.  Not sure if I want the First Last initials look.   
   >   
   > you should... it is the defacto FTN quoting standard... especially if   
   > it adds new ">" to the right of existing ones which is another   
   > defacto FTN quoting standard... i've been manually fixing them in   
   > many of our posts back and forth...   
      
   I dunno.  TB won't do it (unless there is a working Add-On that does it?).   
      
   Besides, if the conversation is between two persons, it is easy to recognize   
   which person wrote what.   
      
   It is commendable of you to fix the lines and add the initials.  (I have done   
   that too.)  But it's really not necessary for every line.   
      
   If it is a very large block, why not save some work and do something like:   
      
   ML wrote: "it is the defacto FTN quoting standard... especially if   
   it adds new ">" to the right of existing ones which is another   
   defacto FTN quoting standard... i've been manually fixing them in   
   many of our posts back and forth..."   
      
      
   adverb: defacto   
      
       1. in fact, or in effect, whether by right or not.   
      
   I would think of the "FL >" initials method more of as a "common standard".   
      
   But just the brackets is fine for me. TB does a fairly decent replacement of   
   the >>'s with vertical ||'s and is just as easy to deal with.   
      
   In fact, oxp adds colour to the different levels of ">>", so actual initials   
   aren't really necessary.  The colour makes things very clear who said what.   
      
   Nothing wrong with a little variety, eh?     
      
      
   >  AA> oxp is clean and simple in operation.  It really brings back a feeling   
   >  AA> from the late 90's though.   
   >   
   > that's as it should be -=B-)   
      
   Well, I've certainly got a lot of variety between TB, Winpoint and OpenXP,   
   don't I?   :/   
      
   --- Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)   
    * Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/2 19/10 123/1970 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 226/17 229/107   
   SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 393/68 396/45 423/120 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 770/1 2452/250   
   PATH: 221/360 1 280/464 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca