Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    POINTS    |    Point usage discussion and systems suppo    |    3,070 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 564 of 3,070    |
|    August Abolins to mark lewis    |
|    trying to get the hang of "oxp"    |
|    03 Apr 19 09:09:11    |
      MSGID: 2:221/360 5ca44e06       REPLY: 1:3634/12.73 5ca43551       PID: JamNNTPd/OS2 1.3 20190208       TID: GE/2 1.2       CHRS: IBMPC 2       TZUTC: 0300       In a post between "mark lewis : August Abolins", on 4/3/2019 12:21 AM              > AA> Next, I might look into the quoting options. By default it is just the       > AA> ">" char. Not sure if I want the First Last initials look.       >       > you should... it is the defacto FTN quoting standard... especially if       > it adds new ">" to the right of existing ones which is another       > defacto FTN quoting standard... i've been manually fixing them in       > many of our posts back and forth...              I dunno. TB won't do it (unless there is a working Add-On that does it?).              Besides, if the conversation is between two persons, it is easy to recognize       which person wrote what.              It is commendable of you to fix the lines and add the initials. (I have done       that too.) But it's really not necessary for every line.              If it is a very large block, why not save some work and do something like:              ML wrote: "it is the defacto FTN quoting standard... especially if       it adds new ">" to the right of existing ones which is another       defacto FTN quoting standard... i've been manually fixing them in       many of our posts back and forth..."                     adverb: defacto               1. in fact, or in effect, whether by right or not.              I would think of the "FL >" initials method more of as a "common standard".              But just the brackets is fine for me. TB does a fairly decent replacement of       the >>'s with vertical ||'s and is just as easy to deal with.              In fact, oxp adds colour to the different levels of ">>", so actual initials       aren't really necessary. The colour makes things very clear who said what.              Nothing wrong with a little variety, eh? |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca