Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    POINTS    |    Point usage discussion and systems suppo    |    3,070 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 430 of 3,070    |
|    August Abolins to Martin Foster    |
|    Winpoint: buggyness?    |
|    27 Mar 19 18:51:34    |
      MSGID: 2:221/1.58 51969c85       CHRS: IBMPC 2       TZUTC: 0400       REPLY: 2:250/1.1 516e9d03       Hello Martin,              On 27.03.19, you wrote to August Abolins:               AA>> I guess we could repurpose one of the other "Header" templates (such as        AA>> "Comment Header") and use that?               MF> Well, you could but I couldn't because I need the "Comment" header, as I        MF> occasionally "Comment reply" ;-)              I don't see a significant difference between Ctrl-K (comment reply) and Ctrl-R       (reply). Both messages get the "quoted" treatment in the new post. What is       the diff that you see?              But the whole matter about a broken Forward (Ctrl-F) may not be a total loss.        When doing a Ctrl-F, the message body is *not* quoted as expected. But we       still have the option to change the destination "Area:" at the top of the new       editing window.              Infact, we can do that with *any* "reply". The only thing missing in a true       Forward is the fancy header/template/preamble.                     ../|ug              --- WinPoint Beta 5 (359.1)        * Origin: Reluctantly Revisiting Fidonet (2:221/1.58)       SEEN-BY: 15/2 123/1970 154/10 203/0 221/1 6 360 226/17 229/107 354       SEEN-BY: 229/426 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/624       SEEN-BY: 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 393/68 396/45 423/120       SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 2452/250       PATH: 221/1 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca