Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    POINTS    |    Point usage discussion and systems suppo    |    3,070 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,994 of 3,070    |
|    Dan Clough to Flavio Bessa    |
|    Re: Why use a Point, and recommendations    |
|    25 Apr 24 19:54:00    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1104.fido_points@1:135/115 2a9039a7       REPLY: 4:801/188 45d8fff2       PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/ad12b9b21 Apr 13 2024 GCC 11.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/ad12b9b21 Apr 13 2024 GCC 11.2.0       BBSID: PALANTIR       CHRS: ASCII 1       -=> Flavio Bessa wrote to Dan Clough <=-               FB> On 31 May 2023, Dan Clough said the following...               DC> Just started following this echo, as I may have an interest in setting        DC> up a point for reading mail. I have a few questions, and apologize if        DC> they've been asked before, which I'm sure they have...               FB> Sure, I will give you my five cents on it.               DC> 1. What pros/cons are there to using a Point, versus reading/writing        DC> echomail directly on a BBS, or with an Offline Reader. I operate a BBS,        DC> and have used offline mail readers for years. Just wondering how/if a        DC> point would be "better" in some way. What can it do for me that I can't        DC> currently do with my OLR (MultiMail)?               FB> Essentially? Nothing, I would say. The only difference        FB> between having a point and using online reading/offline mail        FB> client is that the connection with the BBS is almost        FB> instantaneous - You poll the BBS, get the mail, answer, send your        FB> outbound mail, and that is it. You don't need to log in to a        FB> system to do so.               DC> 2. I'm interested (only) in software for Linux. A glance through the        DC> existing messages here would seem to indicate that 'OpenXP' is the point        DC> software of choice. Pretty much true? Any alternatives to that?               FB> Yes, look for FidoOverIP packages, or you can try some        FB> combination of binkp+crashmail+Golded, which are the most known        FB> alternatives. Personally, I do not like OpenXP interface.               DC> Thanks for taking some time to provide me some info/advice, and I look        DC> forward to participating here.               FB> Hope my five cents have been useful.              Thanks, Flavio, for the feedback. This question I asked was 11 months        ago... and I've definitely decided that I'll stay with the Offline Reader        approach. It's something I'm used to, and MUCH simpler. ;-)              Appreciate the reply.                            ... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.       === MultiMail/Linux v0.52       --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux        * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)       SEEN-BY: 1/120 15/0 18/0 50/109 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 116/116       SEEN-BY: 123/0 25 180 200 755 3001 124/5016 128/260 129/305 135/0       SEEN-BY: 135/115 205 220 225 385 388 390 391 395 153/757 7715 154/10       SEEN-BY: 154/30 203/0 218/700 221/0 1 6 222/2 226/30 227/114 229/110       SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120       SEEN-BY: 240/5832 250/1 266/512 275/1000 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111       SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 299/6 301/1 113 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66       SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280       SEEN-BY: 712/848 1321 770/1 2320/105 3634/0 12 27 56 57 5001/100 5005/49       SEEN-BY: 5020/400 715 846 1042 4441 5030/49 5054/8 30 5061/133 5075/35       SEEN-BY: 5075/128 5083/444       PATH: 135/115 3634/12 5020/1042 301/1 280/464 460/58 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca