home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   POINTS      Point usage discussion and systems suppo      3,070 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,994 of 3,070   
   Dan Clough to Flavio Bessa   
   Re: Why use a Point, and recommendations   
   25 Apr 24 19:54:00   
   
   TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 1104.fido_points@1:135/115 2a9039a7   
   REPLY: 4:801/188 45d8fff2   
   PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/ad12b9b21 Apr 13 2024 GCC 11.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/ad12b9b21 Apr 13 2024 GCC 11.2.0   
   BBSID: PALANTIR   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   -=> Flavio Bessa wrote to Dan Clough <=-   
      
    FB> On 31 May 2023, Dan Clough said the following...   
      
    DC> Just started following this echo, as I may have an interest in setting   
    DC> up a point for reading mail.  I have a few questions, and apologize if   
    DC> they've been asked before, which I'm sure they have...   
      
    FB>     Sure, I will give you my five cents on it.   
      
    DC> 1.  What pros/cons are there to using a Point, versus reading/writing   
    DC> echomail directly on a BBS, or with an Offline Reader.  I operate a BBS,   
    DC> and have used offline mail readers for years.  Just wondering how/if a   
    DC> point would be "better" in some way.  What can it do for me that I can't   
    DC> currently do with my OLR (MultiMail)?   
      
    FB>     Essentially? Nothing, I would say. The only difference   
    FB> between having a point and using online reading/offline mail   
    FB> client is that the connection with the BBS is almost   
    FB> instantaneous - You poll the BBS, get the mail, answer, send your   
    FB> outbound mail, and that is it. You don't need to log in to a   
    FB> system to do so.   
      
    DC> 2.  I'm interested (only) in software for Linux.  A glance through the   
    DC> existing messages here would seem to indicate that 'OpenXP' is the point   
    DC> software of choice.  Pretty much true?  Any alternatives to that?   
      
    FB>     Yes, look for FidoOverIP packages, or you can try some   
    FB> combination of binkp+crashmail+Golded, which are the most known   
    FB> alternatives. Personally, I do not like OpenXP interface.   
      
    DC> Thanks for taking some time to provide me some info/advice, and I look   
    DC> forward to participating here.   
      
    FB>     Hope my five cents have been useful.   
      
   Thanks, Flavio, for the feedback.  This question I asked was 11 months    
   ago... and I've definitely decided that I'll stay with the Offline Reader    
   approach.  It's something I'm used to, and MUCH simpler.  ;-)   
      
   Appreciate the reply.   
      
      
      
   ... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.   
   === MultiMail/Linux v0.52   
   --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux   
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 15/0 18/0 50/109 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 116/116   
   SEEN-BY: 123/0 25 180 200 755 3001 124/5016 128/260 129/305 135/0   
   SEEN-BY: 135/115 205 220 225 385 388 390 391 395 153/757 7715 154/10   
   SEEN-BY: 154/30 203/0 218/700 221/0 1 6 222/2 226/30 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5832 250/1 266/512 275/1000 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 299/6 301/1 113 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66   
   SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 1321 770/1 2320/105 3634/0 12 27 56 57 5001/100 5005/49   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/400 715 846 1042 4441 5030/49 5054/8 30 5061/133 5075/35   
   SEEN-BY: 5075/128 5083/444   
   PATH: 135/115 3634/12 5020/1042 301/1 280/464 460/58 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca