Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    POINTS    |    Point usage discussion and systems suppo    |    3,070 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,961 of 3,070    |
|    Dan Clough to Alan Beck    |
|    Re: Why use a Point, and recommendations    |
|    02 Jun 23 21:16:00    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1077.fido_points@1:135/115 28dfde1f       REPLY: 1:229/426.36 80221d15       PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/e54bed451 May 6 2023 GCC 11.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/e54bed451 May 6 2023 GCC 11.2.0       BBSID: PALANTIR       CHRS: ASCII 1       -=> Alan Beck wrote to Dan Clough <=-               DC>> 1. What pros/cons are there to using a Point, versus reading/writing        DC>> echomail directly on a BBS, or with an Offline Reader. I operate a BBS,        DC>> and have used offline mail readers for years. Just wondering how/if a        DC>> point would be "better" in some way. What can it do for me that I can't        DC>> currently do with my OLR (MultiMail)?               AB>> Being a point is great, you just poll your bossnode and the mail comes        AB>> in, easy peasy.               DC> Yes, I understand that. But it's also easy to grab a QWK packet from        DC> (my) BBS and read/reply that way. So... point has no advantage there.               DC>> 2. I'm interested (only) in software for Linux. A glance through the        DC>> existing messages here would seem to indicate that 'OpenXP' is the point        DC>> software of choice. Pretty much true? Any alternatives to that?               AB>> Explore WinPoint, I use it and love it. You have to wrestle with font        AB>> size but after that it is OK.               |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca