home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   POINTS      Point usage discussion and systems suppo      3,070 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,961 of 3,070   
   Dan Clough to Alan Beck   
   Re: Why use a Point, and recommendations   
   02 Jun 23 21:16:00   
   
   TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 1077.fido_points@1:135/115 28dfde1f   
   REPLY: 1:229/426.36 80221d15   
   PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/e54bed451 May  6 2023 GCC 11.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/e54bed451 May  6 2023 GCC 11.2.0   
   BBSID: PALANTIR   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   -=> Alan Beck wrote to Dan Clough <=-   
      
    DC>> 1.  What pros/cons are there to using a Point, versus reading/writing   
    DC>> echomail directly on a BBS, or with an Offline Reader.  I operate a BBS,   
    DC>> and have used offline mail readers for years.  Just wondering how/if a   
    DC>> point would be "better" in some way.  What can it do for me that I can't   
    DC>> currently do with my OLR (MultiMail)?   
      
    AB>> Being a point is great, you just poll your bossnode and the mail comes   
    AB>> in, easy peasy.   
      
    DC> Yes, I understand that.  But it's also easy to grab a QWK packet from   
    DC> (my) BBS and read/reply that way.  So... point has no advantage there.   
      
    DC>> 2.  I'm interested (only) in software for Linux.  A glance through the   
    DC>> existing messages here would seem to indicate that 'OpenXP' is the point   
    DC>> software of choice.  Pretty much true?  Any alternatives to that?   
      
    AB>> Explore WinPoint, I use it and love it. You have to wrestle with font   
    AB>> size but after that it is OK.   
      
      
      
    DC> Ummmm.... did you miss the part above where I said I was only interested   
    DC> in Linux software?   
      
    AB>> you won't need to qwk again.   
      
    DC> I like using QWK, and the whole point of my questions is to find out if   
    DC> operating as a Point would be any better.  So far I've not seen any   
    DC> indication of that.   
      
      
      
    AB> I find your point comelling.   
      
   I don't know what that sentence means.   
      
    AB> What software do you use as a terminal to get the mail.   
      
   I use Syncterm to log into my BBS and download a QWK packet, and then    
   read/reply the packet using Offline Mail Reader software called    
   Multimail.   
      
    AB> I am very interested in that.   
      
   Okay... It's quite easy and works great.   
      
      
   ... System halted - Press all keys at once to continue.   
   === MultiMail/Linux v0.52   
   --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux   
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/19 120 123 15/0 16/0 18/0 19/10 37 50/109 90/1 105/81 106/201   
   SEEN-BY: 116/116 123/0 25 130 131 170 180 200 755 3001 129/305 135/0   
   SEEN-BY: 135/115 205 300 388 395 142/104 153/757 7715 203/0 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 221/1 6 360 222/2 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 307   
   SEEN-BY: 229/317 400 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 5832 250/1 261/1466   
   SEEN-BY: 266/512 275/1000 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111 292/854 299/6   
   SEEN-BY: 301/1 113 317/3 320/119 219 319 2119 322/0 757 326/101 341/66   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 467/888 633/280 712/848 1321   
   SEEN-BY: 2320/105 3634/0 12 27 56 57 5001/100 5005/49 5020/715 846   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/1042 4441 5030/49 5061/133 5064/56 5075/128 5083/444   
   SEEN-BY: 5090/958   
   PATH: 135/115 3634/12 5020/1042 301/1 221/1 320/219 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca