home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   POINTS      Point usage discussion and systems suppo      3,070 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,706 of 3,070   
   Martin Foster to August Abolins   
   WinPoint development   
   24 Feb 22 09:14:00   
   
   MSGID: 2:310/31.3@fidonet f9bb33a3   
   REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet f9a55e6c   
   PID: OpenXP/5.0.51 (Win32) (i386)   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   TZUTC: 0000   
   Hello August!   
      
   *** Monday 21.02.22 at 14:29, August Abolins wrote to Martin Foster:   
      
   [snip]   
    MF>> Out of the 17 "CONS", there's now only 4 which are still   
    MF>> valid and I can think of at least one addition to the   
    MF>> "PROS" :-)   
      
    AA> Let me know which ones are which.  I can start to update things   
    AA> when I remember how I created that page!   
      
   OK, here we go :-)   
      
   [CONS] The following can be safely removed:   
   -------------------------------------------   
      
   - internal editor: ^Y deletes UNDER the current line.   
      
   - limited to no extended-ascii support   
      
   - does not support incoming areafix lists that are in lowercase [*3]   
      
   - sometimes areafix is created for "0:8/15" address.   
      
   - received nodelists need manual intervention to \WinpointNL directory   
      
   - if you don't specify a domain, WinPoint adds "@" to the end of your AKA     
   [*4]   
      
   - when forwarding a post to another echo/area, the Extra/Options/     
   Templates for the defined header/footer do not get inserted into the new     
   message.   
      
   - when replying to a message (echo or netmail) templates (headers/footers)     
   do not get applied.   
      
   - reply window opens up full screen [*5]   
      
   - when message sort order is last "set" by Received date or Sent date and     
   newest to oldest, the program will always resort by oldest to newest the     
   next time the program is run.   
      
   - when message sort order is last "set" by Bytes and largest to smallest,     
   the program will always resort by smallest to largest the next time the     
   program is run.   
      
   Footnotes 3,4 and 5 can also be safely removed.   
      
   [CONS] I'm unsure about the following:   
   --------------------------------------   
      
   - no highlighting on a search match   
      
   - editor on reply removes 's on a line by line basis; therefore     
   ordered lists/lines/columnar text in incoming messages become reflowed     
   paragraphs.   
      
   And there you have it :-)   
      
   The [PROS] section also needs a bit of attention but I'll post my thoughts     
   in a separate message.   
      
   Regards,   
   Martin   
      
   --- OpenXP 5.0.51   
    * Origin: Bitz-Box - Bradford - UK (2:310/31.3)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 92/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131   
   SEEN-BY: 124/5016 129/305 330 331 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 221/0 1 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 307 317 400 424 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 113 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/234   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250   
   SEEN-BY: 5058/104   
   PATH: 310/31 280/464 301/1 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca