home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   POINTS      Point usage discussion and systems suppo      3,070 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,146 of 3,070   
   Oli to Martin Foster   
   OpenXP 5.0.48 released   
   02 Jan 21 15:00:09   
   
   MSGID: 2:280/464.47 5ff07c60   
   REPLY: 2:310/31.3@fidonet ec040151   
   PID: JamNNTPd/Linux 1   
   CHRS: LATIN-1 2   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   TID: CrashMail II/Linux 1.7   
   Martin wrote (2021-01-01):   
      
    O>> There is no "REPLYTO" kludge in Fidonet,   
      
    MF> Oh?   
      
    MF> = FUTURE4FIDO (2:310/31.3)   
    MF> ==================================================== Msg  : 51 of 101   
    MF>                       Snt From : Benny Pedersen   
    MF> 2:460/58        02 Dec 20 12:05:12 To   : All   
    MF>   Subj : ...   
    MF> ===========================================================   
   ===================   
    MF> @MSGID: 2:460/58 0000054d   
    MF> @PID: tg_BBS_v0.6.2   
    MF> @CHRS: CP866 2   
    MF> @TGUID: 270364579   
    MF> @REPLYTO 2:460/58 270364579   
    MF> Hello :)   
      
    MF> --- tg BBS v0.6.2   
    MF>   * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/58)   
    MF> ===========================================================   
   ===================   
      
   Sorry, I was confused and thought it had something to do with the MSGID and   
   reply linking. I saw REPLYID kludges generated by some software and replyTo is   
   used internally by some message base formats.   
      
   I still don't understand what the REPLYTO kludge is good for in this case. It   
   is also unspecified as a single kludge and not covered by any standard or   
   proposal. There is FSC-0035 (http://ftsc.org/docs/fsc-0035.001) which defines   
   REPLYADDR *and* REPLYTO in combination (both have to be included in the   
   message).   
      
   Using the REPLYTO address and ignoring the REPLYADDR could cause issues and is   
   not a correct implementation of FSC-0035. If this is not intended to be an   
   implementation of FSC-0035, maybe the Telegram Gateway and OpenXP should use   
   another kludge.   
      
   ---   
    * Origin:  (2:280/464.47)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 154/10 203/0 221/0   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 664 1016 1017 240/5832   
   SEEN-BY: 249/110 206 317 400 280/464 5003 288/100 292/854 8125 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250   
   PATH: 280/464 229/101 426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca