MSGID: 1:153/757.0 75c9d12f   
   REPLY: 2:221/360 5e79a790   
   TZUTC: -0700   
   CHARSET: LATIN-1   
   Hello Tommi,   
      
   >> I still find arcmail bundles are neat, tidy and efficient.   
      
   > Correct. :) But arcmail should only be sent via secure link.   
      
   Why is that?   
      
   >And since this is a POINTS echo, it is a good practise to archive thousands of   
   > tiny .pkts instead of sending them separately. Points can't receive crash,   
   > normally.   
      
   True, points and other nodes on hold are best set to arcmail so the number of   
   files doesn't grow in your outbound.   
      
   > Arcmail doesn't necessarily mean compressing. :)   
      
   When I think of arcmail I think of a bundle of PKT files archived together for   
   easy storage and delivery to the recipient. Is there more to it?   
      
   >And August, you have 254 files on hold for your point .59. Would it be time to   
   > pick them up?   
      
   > === Cut ===   
   > ^\xenia\outbound\00dd0001.pnt\797ac504.pkt   
   > ^\xenia\outbound\00dd0001.pnt\79468f08.pkt   
   > ^\xenia\outbound\00dd0001.pnt\79437604.pkt   
   > ^\xenia\outbound\00dd0001.pnt\7926b005.pkt   
      
   Whowah! That's what I'm talkin' about!   
      
   --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-4   
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 57/0 90/1 153/250 154/10 203/0 220/70 221/0 227/114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/101 426 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 267/800 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 288/100 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 340/1000 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/0 1 100 330 340 772/0 1 220 230   
   SEEN-BY: 772/500 2452/250   
   PATH: 153/757 250 770/1 280/464 229/426