MSGID: 2:221/360 5cf219f6   
   REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet d8f064ad   
   PID: JamNNTPd/OS2 1.3 20190208   
   TID: GE/2 1.2   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   TZUTC: 0300   
   Hi! August,   
      
   On 06/01/2019 03:31 AM, you wrote:   
      
   > I originally used SEM in OS/2 with its builtin Windows support.  Very   
   > smooth, no problems.   So I wonder - SEM may not be the best choice in   
   > today's standalone 32/64bit Win OSes.  But I'll see if the garbage chars   
   > duplicate in an XP w/Fastecho combination.   
      
   Yes.  You say it way better than I.  My configuration has been running as a   
   node on & off for a very long time (late noughties), in Win98SE. It was   
   originally a real PC but I copied everything into a VirtualBox (vBox) setup in   
   early 2012.  It only broke in Aug 2018 due to a cause not of its own making.    
   I just don't run it as a node any longer.   
      
   Have fun with your FastEcho config & XP!  I never trusted XP much with my Fido   
   stuff.  Just a couple of utils (two!).  I was always looking over my shoulder   
   since it has two command processors.  I.e. double the chance of screwing up.    
   )   
      
   Cheers,   
   Paul.   
      
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0   
    * Origin: - nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland - (2:221/360)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 19/10 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 226/17 229/354   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 393/68 396/45 423/120 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 770/1 2452/250   
   PATH: 221/360 1 280/464 229/426