Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    PCBOARD    |    PCBoard Support directly from Clark Deve    |    815 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 246 of 815    |
|    John Kelly to Robert Wolfe    |
|    Re: UMM.. PCBOARD NATURAL    |
|    21 Jan 14 19:27:00    |
             -> -> How can SIO handle the port without an IRQ? Use polling?              -> It will; however, IIRC only if native OS/2 comm apps are using the       -> port. Otherwise, you have to assign IRQs for DOS and Win64 comm              You're thinking of the DOS reflection IRQ provided by the vsio.sys       virtual device driver. The sio.sys physical device driver requires an       IRQ (possibly shared) for every port; it will not do polling.              I think Holger assumed that my IRQ 3 was a motherboard com port that       could be disabled in the BIOS. That's not so; it's a PCI expansion card       that PCI assigns to IRQ 3, because there is no COM2 on the motherboard.              So I'm stuck with IRQ 3, like it or not. But as Mark said, sio2k may be       the problem. I'll try again with SIO 1.60d.              --- PCBoard (R) v15.4/M 250 Beta        * Origin: Torres Vedras - Portugal (2:362/6)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca