ies,comp.os.os2.programmer.misc   
   re2KqWXDBefzZKuYc0iNwYXMBXDyhLp39XzpD9vGt5XQTTJun54qJ9VYzIgh2Ubt   
   /SEHag8VAqXnI0bHSxIoOfYwUfd9cwPg9zZaxWsZIo5lYMxfUPBe1g0HQUWdHgN4   
   alsi+DgwHjfGg==   
   comp.os.os2.utilities:184 comp.os.os2.programmer.misc:2111   
   From: "Allan"    
      
   On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:49:05 UTC, "Andy"  wrote:    
      
   > > > I just pulled the code from svn, unfortunately there are no bldlevel    
   > > > strings so at first I didn't realize this but the trunk built 0.9.11.    
   > > > I don't see a 0.9.14 tag, what do I need to pull for 0.9.14?   
   > > > Chkdsk shows (UFAT32.DLL version 0.9.11 compiled on Apr 05 2011) is    
   > > > how I determined the build level.   
   > >    
   > > Looks like the 'branches' version are more complete and uptodate.   
   > >    
   > OK, branches does seem more uptodate (I am still used to thinking CVS    
   > where Trunk is the most uptodate testing stuff).  However, it is still   
   > showing as 0.9.13 and not the 0.9.14, not sure if that is cosmetic or    
   > if I still haven't found the latest code.   
      
   There is no newer code in svn, according to trac.   
   Wiki for FAT32 recommends fetching trunk too - but if you look around   
   in TRAC and looks at the revisions, you can easily see, that trunk is   
   missing some of the latest revision done before 0.9.13   
      
   0.9.14 - well, it isn't released yet, isn't it ? So obviously, there is no such   
   version - not even in svn. Updating the version number/bldlevel is the   
   last thing you do, before putting out a new public version.   
      
      
   --    
     Allan.   
      
   It is better to close your mouth, and look like a fool,   
   than to open it, and remove all doubt.   
      
   --- Internet Rex 2.31   
    * Origin: Datemas.de http://www.news.datemas.de (1:261/20.999)