.os2.beta,comp.os.os2.utilities   
   U1kvk0iaKkFYKSpdJxH8o5uksHgskHPymG9G0/EBkQtiDEozA==   
   tQ+KdqzxvVvUW7xR28CaVapQKKZL5mgYr/yYfqM10LqyFefjSdsJlSauZrFe1NaJ   
   AqZ4Q2qGLmlW+7ea/SNLm7Z/Z3Z5BRNa7ZF0IsHc9Rkh7ckg"; mail-complain   
   s-to="abuse@albasani.net"   
   comp.os.os2.misc:3158 comp.os.os2.beta:141 comp.os.os2.utilities:183   
   From: "Andy"    
      
   On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:08:21 UTC, "Allan"     
   wrote:   
      
   > On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:42:03 UTC, "Andy"  wrote:    
   >    
   > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 05:51:23 UTC, KO Myung-Hun     
   > > wrote:   
   > >    
   > > > Anyway, I did not release the 0.9.14 because it has not any enhancements   
   > > > for end-users, but just for developers. In addition, FAT32.IFS already   
   > > > has a good replacement for DASD IO.   
   > > > And currently, DosWrite() does not work due to an Access Denied error.   
   > > > What I said "I don't know what the cause is" is this.   
   > > >    
   > >    
   > > I just pulled the code from svn, unfortunately there are no bldlevel    
   > > strings so at first I didn't realize this but the trunk built 0.9.11.    
   > > I don't see a 0.9.14 tag, what do I need to pull for 0.9.14?   
   > > Chkdsk shows (UFAT32.DLL version 0.9.11 compiled on Apr 05 2011) is    
   > > how I determined the build level.   
   >    
   > Looks like the 'branches' version are more complete and uptodate.   
   >    
   OK, branches does seem more uptodate (I am still used to thinking CVS    
   where Trunk is the most uptodate testing stuff).  However, it is still   
   showing as 0.9.13 and not the 0.9.14, not sure if that is cosmetic or    
   if I still haven't found the latest code.   
   Andy   
      
   --    
      
      
   --- Internet Rex 2.31   
    * Origin: albasani.net (1:261/20.999)