.guns,alt.religion.christian,comp.os.os2.advocacy   
   <2bgl78dqn3qr5so823io8gpeuoaeujpn0p@4ax.com>     
        
   In article ,   
    duke  wrote:   
      
   > >Yea, and all this talk of gravity just always gets me down.   
   >    
   > The great the mass, the more the pull.   
      
   But in the case of claims for gods, there is more suck than pull.   
      
    Atheists say that they do not believe   
   any gods exist.    
      
   But as atheism is not a claim about whether any gods actually  exist, it    
   has no need of proof.   
      
   On the other hand, those theists who claim that their notions of gods    
   are actual are each claiming something that requires objective physical    
   evidence to establish it, but for which they have no objective physical    
   evidence.      
      
   To reprise:    
      
   LACK of belief in the existence of something, as in atheism,  is only    
   problematic when there is a plentiful supply of objective physical    
   evidence that that thing actually exists. Which is NOT the case.   
      
   PRESENCE of belief in the existence of something, as in theism,  is only    
   problematic when there is a total lack of objective physical evidence    
   that that thing actually exists. Which IS the case.    
      
      
      
   ***************************************   
      
   Obama is on the side of people.   
   Romney is on the side of wealth.   
   Which side are you on?   
       
   ***************************************   
   --    
   "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less   
    remote from the- truth who believes nothing than    
   he who believes what is wrong.   
                        Thomas Jefferson   
      
   --- MBSE BBS v0.95.15 (GNU/Linux-i386)   
    * Origin: None (1:116/18@fidonet)