alt.support.boy-lovers,rec.arts.tv   
   t.googlegroups.com> <91a9abd6-f62a-4127-9e72-724e57e3b70e@b19g20   
   0vbt.googlegroups.com>  <6d3f519f   
   489a-47a3-a664-b180fbdec971@l12g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>   
   In article <6d3f519f-489a-47a3-a664-b180fbdec971@l12g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>,   
   "Syd M."  said:   
      
   >>>>> We shall fight that Nigger tooth and nail. We will not agree   
   >>>>> to or vote for anything he proposes and stop him from creating   
   >>>>> any more silliness like Obamacare.   
   >>   
   >>>> Golly, you sure do talk big!   
   >>   
   >>> Do you really believe they will make passing even the smallest   
   >>> bill easy for him? The odds are better of the KKK allowing a   
   >>> Nigger to join them.   
   >>   
   >> A minute or so ago you were saying "we," but now it's "they."   
   >> What happened?   
   >   
   > It is notable that you merely make an issue over words rather than   
   > to dispute the validity of my comments, loser.   
      
   Snork.  Saying "We" means that the speaker -- that'd be you -- is   
   going to do something personally.  You sure dropped that fast,   
   didn't you?   
      
   (Oh, and you might want to re-evaluate that 'loser' bit in light of   
   the election results.)   
      
   -- wds   
      
      
   --- MBSE BBS v0.95.15 (GNU/Linux-i386)   
    * Origin: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC (1:116/18@fidonet)