Thunderbird/16.0.2   
   .guns,alt.religion.christian,comp.os.os2.advocacy   
   <88KdndMdj4D8WunNnZ2dnUVZ_rmdnZ2d@giganews.com>     
      
   On 10/10/2012 10:53 AM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >   
   > "linuxgal"  wrote in message   
   > news:oL6dnY6x0ccrfenNnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   >> deep wrote:   
   >>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:55:02 -0700, linuxgal    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Fred^2 wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Christian shitbox Republicunts would scream bloody murder if their own   
   >>>>> history was actually taught.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The one where Republicans like Lincoln and Grant freed the slaves from   
   >>>> the Democrap rednecks and peckerwoods?  Or later history when   
   >>>> Republican   
   >>>> Martin Luther King related his dream?   
   >>>   
   >>> Only idiots who know nothing of Civil War history would call Lincoln a   
   >>> Republican in today's sense.   
   >>   
   >> The topic is not "today's sense" because that's current events.   The   
   >> topic, set by yourself, is "Republicunt history".   
   >>   
   >   
   > But if we are to argue, that Republicans shifted somewhat from the   
   > Original platform of the Republican party under Lincoln, then sadly we   
   > have to conclude that the Democrats have NOT shifted ONE BIT from the   
   > Democratic Party position at the time of Lincoln   
   > If you remember, they were the ones all for keeping Slavery.   
   >     The only difference is that today, instead of using whips and   
   > chains, they do it with financial enslavement called entitlements, under   
   > various names, like welfare, Equal opportunity, and so forth.   
   >   
   Black people were owned by Democrats before the Civil WAR, and Democrats    
   still _own_ black people.   
   >   
   >   
      
      
   --- MBSE BBS v0.95.15 (GNU/Linux-i386)   
    * Origin: Public Usenet Newsgroup Access (1:116/18@fidonet)