Thunderbird/16.0.2   
   EzvNnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@giganews.com>    
      
   On 19/11/2012 18:03, Carl wrote:   
   > On 11/17/12 1:51 PM, dccxxvii wrote:   
   >> Carl ( carl@noaddress.invalid ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:   
   >>   
   >>> On 11/16/12 3:55 AM, dccxxvii wrote:   
   >>>> Now that the troll tholen has seemingly departed and the plethora of   
   >>>> junk he generated has died down, would anyone actually interested in   
   >>>> OS/2 like to give me reasons why I might want use it in preference   
   >>>> to other OS's?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> If a computer does what you want and need, why upgrade?   
   >>   
   >> Is OS/2 an upgrade though? That's the question....   
   >   
   > Not by today's measure, I would say.   
   >   
   > However, if you have been using OS/2 for the past two decades, you might not   
   > feel like upgrading if you think that modern systems don't really offer that   
   > much additional value.   
      
   You mean there are people out there who aren't on Facebook?   
      
   Man!   
      
   HP   
      
   --- MBSE BBS v0.95.15 (GNU/Linux-i386)   
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (1:116/18@fidonet)