s2.misc,comp.os.os2.networking.misc   
   s2.setup.misc:364 de.comp.os.os2.misc:1107 comp.os.os2.networking.misc:176   
   3ca1b5e8   
   From: "PaulRS"    
      
   On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:24:42 UTC, "Herr Willms"    
    wrote:   
      
   First, it looks like you are on the right track . . .   
      
   > Am Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:59:10 UTC, schrieb "Herr Willms"    
   > auf comp.os.os2.misc :   
   >    
   > > a) from Samba print dialog:   
   > > > Printparms='"smbprn.00000007.Hw94nl" "FxPrint" "Testseite" "0" "43427"'   
      
   Where are the above "Printparms . . ." coming from? If parameter 4 is   
   "pages" as stated below in excuting smbprint.exe w/o parameters then    
   "0" pages may be the problem. I would guess that FxPrint would not do   
   anything for "0" pages. (continued down)   
      
   > >    
   > > b) from the configuration file:   
   > > > print command = C:\APPS\SAMBA\smbprint.exe "%s" "%p" "%J" "%c" "%z"   
   >    
   > Executing SMBPRINT.EXE without any paramters get it to spell this    
   > out:    
   >    
   > smbprint.exe "spoolfile" "printerqueue" "jobname" "pages" "jobsize"   
   >    
   > Let's see what happens when I call smbprint.exe manually.    
   >    
   > I have produced by "print to file" a printfile. When I copy it to    
   > the LPT port which is used by Fxprint, then everything goes fine --    
   > the printfile appears as fax waiting to be sent over the wire.    
   >    
   > When I use smbprint.exe in this form    
   >    
   > > smbprint.exe "testprint.prm" "fxprint" "testpage" "3" "128494"   
      
    Here, "testprint.prm" does not appear to be a "spoolfile" - smbprint   
   is probably looking in the "spool" directory for a spool file. If    
   there is a valid spool file sent over the net in this directory you    
   might try substituting its name and a proper number of pages in your    
   manual test.   
    If this works, the problem seems to be from your original #1 post    
   with the "0" pages and where it is coming from as the rest of the    
   parameters look OK.   
      
    Again, I think you are on the right track - just depends how much    
   time you have to "PLAY!" (I always liked the SuSE Linux prompt "Have    
   a lot of fun" as I was pulling may hair out trying to do something and   
   figure out why things were not working ;-) Is this FUN yet?   
      
       
   >    
   > then Faxwork is happy with the command, makes an entry in the list    
   > of faxes, but does not show the file to be sent. Well, one problem    
   > seems to have been solved, namely that of the "Unknown Job-ID" which    
   > the Faxworks printer driver complains about. But the actual content of   
   > the file to be printed does not appear. The same happens with a file    
   > which is actually transferred via the net and which then gets a name    
   > like "smbprn.00000004.50wJVF". It is OK when I simply COPY this file    
   > to the LPT port assigned to the Faxprint driver.    
   >    
   >    
   > Cheers,   
   > L.W.   
   >    
   > -------------------------------------------------------   
   > Gewinnen und verlieren in einer Diskussion k”nnen sich    
   > vernnftigerweise nur beziehen auf Gewinn an Erkenntnis und Verlust    
   > von Vorurteilen. Wer meint, es ginge um Gewinnen von Pl„tzen in der    
   > Hackordnung und Niedermachen eines "Gegners", sollte sich begraben    
   > lassen.    
   >    
      
      
   --    
      
      
   --- Internet Rex 2.31   
    * Origin: The gateway at Omicron Theta (1:261/20.999)   
|