From: "Andy"    
      
   On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 09:11:51 UTC, "Rich Walsh"    
    wrote:   
      
   > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:21:19 UTC, Steve Wendt wrote:   
   > > tholen@antispam.ham wrote:   
   > >    
   > > > then is somebody interested in the crash report?   
   > >    
   > > Probably not at this point, but you can examine it to see where the    
   > > crash occurred (look for the line that says "Trap ->"   
   >    
   > The reason we're not interested right now is that _something_ happened   
   > that causes the linker (ilink) to omit most function names and addresses   
   > from the map files it generates.  Without that info, Exceptq's report is   
   > nearly useless because it can't identify the specific function where a   
   > trap occurred (i.e. 'the line that says "Trap ->"').   
   >    
   > We're gearing up to start using the Watcom linker which will provide   
   > the missing info.  However, there are still a few things we have to   
   > iron out.   
   >    
   What issues are you seeing with the Watcom linker?  I don't recall    
   seeing any issues when I was using it previously.  I never got around    
   to getting wrc to replace rc but Knut's wl worked without issues (I    
   can't say if it would fix the issue you are wanting to fix here    
   though).   
   Andy   
      
   --    
      
      
   --- Internet Rex 2.31   
    * Origin: TeraNews.com (1:261/20.999)