OYWBBEI2i9kgcXJgo@Lgii0NjCN;MMO603GJD_K5m6:hY:9LIQ   
      
   On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:05:43 UTC, Lars Erdmann  wrote:   
   > Allan wrote:   
   > > On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 23:03:57 UTC, Lars Erdmann    
   wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> a long time ago, that a patch was made available to the USBEHCD   
   > >> IBM driver, that made it almost twice as fast here.   
   > >   
   > > Maybe you can add a cmd line parameter, to set this.   
   >    
   > There are people that believe it to be more important to not disturb timing   
   > sensitive applications. At least that's a request from someone else.   
      
   I don't know of any app on OS/2 that uses isochronous transfer and thus has   
   a "right" to be timing-sensitive.  Apps using bulk transfer should not expect   
   data to arrive on any schedule.  If they do, they're probably badly designed.   
   (OK, whose toes did I just step on?)   
      
   In any case, the vast majority of users are doing interrupt-driven bulk   
   transfers to/from storage devices and would like to see the process move   
   along as quickly as possible.   
      
   > a parameter to control this is certainly feasible. I'll think about it.   
      
   Please do.   
      
      
   --    
   == == almost usable email address:  Rich AT E-vertise.Com == ==   
      
      
   --- Internet Rex 2.31   
    * Origin: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com (1:261/20.999)