p70hk+pWGVyzt2785+AgpOY8xGmk2oaaBtjEd7QjbUiQHbS7w==   
   4ihrRE/2wzA0vLSm29gx3y9G1J9iRO5o1Wc7+MFh1HusbpRlu/h/1ABW0PJKSYyH   
   I1odjfo1tYNXVbSbBgzshr1LWp7/wNL4EQIMieTHaR7OiAJH"; mail-complain   
   s-to="abuse@albasani.net"   
   omp.os.os2.misc:2861   
   From: "Ruediger Ihle"    
      
   On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:58:54 UTC, Steve Wendt  wrote:   
      
   > And GENGRADD has SBFILTER - do you know how that compares?   
      
   No. I havn't tried...   
      
      
   > > DIVE is not accelerated at all by Panorama.   
   >    
   > I guess the claims I saw were erroneous, then.   
      
   The only way I could think of achiving a performance gain for   
   DIVE is the MTRR setup. In case the other tested driver would   
   not do this correctly, Panorama might show a speed improvement   
   on DIVE operation as well.   
      
      
   > And yet, I suspect this is handled correctly by GENGRADD and SBFILTER.   
      
   Havn't tried either.   
      
      
      
   --    
   Ruediger "Rudi" Ihle [S&T Systemtechnik GmbH, Germany]   
   http://www.s-t.de   
      
      
   --- Internet Rex 2.31   
    * Origin: S&T (1:261/20.999)