TZUTC: -0700   
   MSGID: 850.net_dev@1:103/705 230a6628   
   REPLY: 1:18/200.0 5ea50b32   
   PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Win32  Apr 25 2020 MSC 1925   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.10-Linux r3.160 Apr 24 2020 GCC 6.3.0   
   COLS: 80   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.103   
     Re: Re: Packet password case   
     By: Sean Dennis to Rob Swindell on Sat Apr 25 2020 11:16 pm   
      
    > Hi Rob,   
    >   
    >  RS> NetMail from insecure inbound, sure. I was talking about EchoMail.   
    >   
    > That's what I get for responding to mail when I'm half-asleep.  Yes, you're   
    > right: tossing unsecure echomail is just asking for problems.  Though I   
    > don't think I've seen any, uhm, issues with that since the late 90s when   
    > there were certain people in a certain mail network that were causing   
    > issues.   
      
   Oh, we were all young trouble-makers at some point, weren't we? :-)   
      
   Someone else did point out that if you had 2 authenticated links sending files   
   into a shared secure inbound, one could impersonate the other very easily   
   unless packet passwords were used. That's one case where the use of inboxes   
   could provide more security.   
      
                                               digital man   
      
   Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #29:   
   FOSSIL = Fido/Opus/SEAdog Standard Interface Layer   
   Norco, CA WX: 72.1øF, 52.0% humidity, 0 mph SSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs   
   --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 103/705 9999 120/340 601 154/10 203/0 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 288/100 292/854 8125 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1   
   PATH: 103/705 280/464 229/426