Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    NET_DEV    |    Forum for Fidonet developer questions    |    342 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 282 of 342    |
|    Alan Ianson to Oli    |
|    Pssword ord ord case insensitive or not?    |
|    23 Apr 20 02:36:36    |
      REPLY: 2:280/464.47@fidonet 5ea14a56       MSGID: 1:153/757 5ea16361       CHRS: UTF-8 2       TZUTC: -0700       TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 2020-04-15       Hello Oli,               AI>> That's an interesting idea but you'd have to communicate the        AI>> location of that inbound filebox to your tosser somehow.               Ol> It could be like BSO for inbound. You just need a good specification        Ol> for the format. E.g. Node 7:8/9 calls and received files are put into               Ol> inbound/othernet.7.8.9.0/trusted/               Ol> or if there is no session password into               Ol> inbound/othernet.7.8.9.0/unknown/               Ol> No need to specifiy an inbox for every node and point in the mailer's        Ol> config.              I think that's an interesting idea and as Tommi suggested it could be made to       work with environment variables or include files.              I'm happy with my inbound as it is and can't think of any reason to make it       more complicated.               AI>> If we had a reliable/secure session we wouldn't need packet        AI>> passwords or inbound directories randomly placed around the file        AI>> system.               Ol> I still don't understand how that helps. What exactly do you have in        Ol> mind?              I don't actually have anything in mind. I dunno how we got on this topic. :)               Ol> The problem is the interface between mailer and tosser. Everyone with        Ol> a session password can drop anything in my shared "secure" inbound. So        Ol> now we need a packet password, because the information about the        Ol> session is thrown out the window and isn't communicated to the tosser.        Ol> We wouldn't need a packet password, if the tosser did know that the        Ol> packet was delivered in an authenticated session with node 7:8/9.              Isn't that the difference between a secure and unsecure inbound?              It is a shared inbound but it is secure.               Ttyl :-),        Al              --- GoldED+/LNX        * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 57/0 90/1 103/705 120/340 601 153/250 154/10       SEEN-BY: 203/0 220/70 221/0 226/17 30 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832       SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 267/800 280/464 5003 288/100 292/854 8125 310/31       SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 340/1000 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848       SEEN-BY: 770/0 1 100 340 772/0 1 210 220 230 500       PATH: 153/757 7715 250 770/1 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca