home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   NET_DEV      Forum for Fidonet developer questions      342 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 242 of 342   
   Rob Swindell to Wilfred van Velzen   
   Packet password case insensitive or not?   
   21 Apr 20 16:12:07   
   
   TZUTC: -0700   
   MSGID: 796.net_dev@1:103/705 2304b6e3   
   REPLY: 2:280/464 5e9ee003   
   PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Win32  Apr 21 2020 MSC 1925   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.10-Linux r3.159 Apr 19 2020 GCC 6.3.0   
   COLS: 80   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.103   
     Re: Packet password case insensitive or not?   
     By: Wilfred van Velzen to All on Tue Apr 21 2020 01:58 pm   
      
    > Hi All,   
    >   
    > I was wondering about packet passwords, are they case insensitive or not?   
    >   
    > FMail has always forced them to uppercase on entry in the configuration, and   
    > does a case insensitive compare on the password contained in arrived packet   
    > files.   
    >   
    > fts-0001.016 just says this about the password:   
    >   
    >   password   (some impls)   
    >        eight bytes   
    >        null padded   
    >   
    > "bytes": So it could be anything, including "high ascii".   
    >   
    > When I look at the packets I receive, there are some with lower or even   
    > mixed case passwords.   
    > (So it's a good thing FMail does a case insensitive compare, otherwise it   
    > wouldn't match against the configured uppercase password)   
      
   SBBSecho has always treated packet passwords case-INsensitively. It is   
   unfortuate that so many of the fido specifications were so badly written to   
   begin with and the resulting ambiguities and contradictions have never been   
   sufficiently addressed by the FTSC. Luckily, with password-protected mail   
   sessions the norm these days, packet passwords are kind of moot and probably   
   should just be deprecated. Doubt that'll happen though.   
      
                                               digital man   
      
   Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #16:   
   CVS = Concurrent Versioning System   
   Norco, CA WX: 70.6øF, 55.0% humidity, 8 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs   
   --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 103/705 9999 120/340 601 154/10 203/0 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 288/100 292/854 8125 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1   
   PATH: 103/705 280/464 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca