Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    NET_DEV    |    Forum for Fidonet developer questions    |    342 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 242 of 342    |
|    Rob Swindell to Wilfred van Velzen    |
|    Packet password case insensitive or not?    |
|    21 Apr 20 16:12:07    |
      TZUTC: -0700       MSGID: 796.net_dev@1:103/705 2304b6e3       REPLY: 2:280/464 5e9ee003       PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Win32 Apr 21 2020 MSC 1925       TID: SBBSecho 3.10-Linux r3.159 Apr 19 2020 GCC 6.3.0       COLS: 80       CHRS: CP437 2       NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.103        Re: Packet password case insensitive or not?        By: Wilfred van Velzen to All on Tue Apr 21 2020 01:58 pm               > Hi All,        >        > I was wondering about packet passwords, are they case insensitive or not?        >        > FMail has always forced them to uppercase on entry in the configuration, and        > does a case insensitive compare on the password contained in arrived packet        > files.        >        > fts-0001.016 just says this about the password:        >        > password (some impls)        > eight bytes        > null padded        >        > "bytes": So it could be anything, including "high ascii".        >        > When I look at the packets I receive, there are some with lower or even        > mixed case passwords.        > (So it's a good thing FMail does a case insensitive compare, otherwise it        > wouldn't match against the configured uppercase password)              SBBSecho has always treated packet passwords case-INsensitively. It is       unfortuate that so many of the fido specifications were so badly written to       begin with and the resulting ambiguities and contradictions have never been       sufficiently addressed by the FTSC. Luckily, with password-protected mail       sessions the norm these days, packet passwords are kind of moot and probably       should just be deprecated. Doubt that'll happen though.               digital man              Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #16:       CVS = Concurrent Versioning System       Norco, CA WX: 70.6øF, 55.0% humidity, 8 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs       --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux        * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 103/705 9999 120/340 601 154/10 203/0 218/700       SEEN-BY: 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/426 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 280/464       SEEN-BY: 280/5003 288/100 292/854 8125 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200       SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1       PATH: 103/705 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca