INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR tracker1@roughneckbbs.com.remove-this   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID:  3af808b3   
   REPLY: 1:129/215.0 268874a8   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   On 1/10/23 13:57, g00r00 wrote:   
    >   
    > But if I am not mistaken it can't hang with Intel in terms of the   
    > number of CPU cycles it takes to do things, which means it'll always   
    > be better to grab a non-RISC device over RISC for a BBS anyway.   
      
   In fairness, per thread/process, ARM doesn't either... As for a BBS,   
   even an RPi is more than enough, same for the RISC-V boards.  Depends on   
   how many simultaneous users you're likely to see and how much web   
   traffic you may need to fend off.   
      
   That said, by the time you add a case and storage, one of the mini intel   
   celeron/pentium boxes (N6005, J4125, N5100, etc) are a better value   
   option at similar cost.   
      
   --   
   Michael J. Ryan   
   tracker1(at)roughneckbbs.com   
   https://www.roughneckbbs.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 114/705 120/340 123/120 131   
   SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/7715 154/10 218/700 840 220/70 226/17 30 100   
   SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 114 206 275 307 317 400 424 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 452 470 550 664 700 250/5 8 266/512 267/800 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 298/25 305/2 3 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 3 100 340 772/210 220 230   
   PATH: 770/3 1 317/3 229/426