home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   MYSTIC      Mystic support echo      16,010 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 14,687 of 16,010   
   Wilfred van Velzen to Nicholas Boel   
   Re: Is this thing on?   
   17 Apr 22 21:41:25   
   
   TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221   
   MSGID: 2:280/464 625c6e0f   
   REPLY: 1:154/10 625c21ad   
   Hi Nicholas,   
      
   On 2022-04-17 09:00:40, you wrote to me:   
      
    NB>>> Not sure what to tell you. Anything I write should leave here to   
    NB>>> all links at roughly the same time. Does the order of callouts   
    NB>>> have anything to do with how you list nodes in binkd.conf? If so,   
    NB>>> my list starts with 1: and 2: is further down the list in   
    NB>>> numerical order. Otherwise, who knows.   
      
    WV>> It of course depends on in what order your tosser presents the files   
    WV>> to binkd. But besides that it should handle most of the outgoing mail   
    WV>> in parallel, unless you have your maxclients set to a low value...   
      
    WV>> But your log should be able to tell you what happend (if you're   
    WV>> interested enough ;-))...   
      
    NB> Besides what is already out in the open, the other things I can think of   
   is   
    NB> (1) an issue that I'm in the process of resolving is that 301/1 connects   
    NB> here about 1500 times per day, and roughly 1450 of them are failed   
    NB> connections.. This I can't really do anything about until I get a   
   response,   
    NB> and (2) with over 100 links, if 1 or more of them are down and maxclients   
    NB> is set to a low number, it delays as long as it takes for the connection   
   to   
    NB> timeout - which can also hold things up quite a bit. Every once in awhile   
   I   
    NB> look into this and remove dead or unresponsive links. What else more can I   
    NB> say?   
      
   This sounds like a very plausible cause for what I've seen happening.   
      
    NB> I don't remember why I originally set my maxclients to a lower value,   
    NB> but something not happening the way I wanted it to in the past made me   
    NB> do it. That said, I've raised it for now to see if it makes things   
    NB> faster. However, if I start having other issues because of it.. 4   
    NB> minutes in transit is still better than a week or more via snail mail.   
    NB> ;)   
      
   Indeed... I just found it odd. In the end it doesn't really matter if mail   
   comes in via another longer route, as long as it comes in... ;-)   
      
   Bye, Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 124/5016   
   SEEN-BY: 129/305 330 331 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 840 221/0   
   SEEN-BY: 221/1 6 242 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 307 317 400   
   SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 428 452 550 664 700 230/0 240/5832 266/512 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 335/364 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 633/280 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 2452/250 4500/1   
   PATH: 280/464 221/1 6 229/664 426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca