TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A47   
   MSGID: 3:770/100 beafe026   
   REPLY: 1:229/426 A9DA11F7   
   TZUTC: 1300   
   On 10 Feb 2022 at 07:30p, Nick Andre pondered and said...   
       
    NA> I ring the Cowbell for feedback on this scenario:   
      
   what does this mean? Is cowbell some USA/Canada thing or reference to pop   
   culture or?   
      
    NA> A downlink of mine wants to lovingly request all 60,000+ Usenet areas    
    NA> available on my system. My system happily fufills the requests...  but I   
      
   [snip]   
      
    NA> Asking because I want to recommend Mystic with its JAM storage format   
    NA> for this daunting task instead of the *.MSG format D'Bridge is currently   
    NA> limited to.   
      
   I looked into this some time ago thinking of using Mystic for a Usenet HUB.    
      
    NA> - What is the maximum size of an Areafix request in Mystic?   
      
   this one is big, the current mutil.ini talks of a rescan size of 999999999   
   messages. if you mean size of packet or arc size  you can set that also or   
   make it unlimited.   
      
    NA> - How many total Echomail areas can Mystic handle?   
      
   This one I want to say circa 500 but I may well be wrong, I know I think least   
   time I played I started to hit some limits here. Ideally you want (as you   
   mention) 60k bases etc.   
      
   Another issue is if you are gating long named newsgroups to echomail you are   
   limited to the total number of characters allowed in an echomail tag. That's   
   where I have found the real pinch points. Sure you can get the gate to remap a   
   really long usenet group to a shorter echomail tag but it's not ideal and even   
   then you are limited to whatever total length the echomail tag is.   
      
   An inbuilt gateway into Mystic would be nice, or some way the software can   
   accommodate super long newsgroup names without much (or any) conversion   
   required.   
      
    NA> - If he chose to use Mystic, and if Mystic handles Passthru areas, does   
    NA> it automatically clean-up unused passthru areas (areas with one link   
    NA> left, that of the uplink). For example, this downlink gets a rescan of   
    NA> the last 100 messages, and most of these Usenet groups are deadwood. He   
    NA> decides later that  he wants to un-Areafix the deadwood from my system.   
    NA> Can he run some sort of  report or process on his proverbial Mystic   
    NA> system to do so?   
      
   I think not, and there is no passthru that I am aware of in Mystic, but you   
   raise a good point/question about reporting of stats for echos which is an   
   area I know James and I had been talking about some time back.   
      
   There is now some stats tracking in place per echonode but I'm not aware of   
   any stats tracking for echomail area or reporting that can (as yet) be pulled   
   out of Mystic using a MUTIL function.   
      
   I'd be interested in playing with anything developed above and with the NNTP   
   server I run that presently uses (I suspect) the same gateway tools you do.   
      
   Best, Paul   
      
   --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/24 (Linux/64)   
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (3:770/100)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 114/705 120/340 123/120 131   
   SEEN-BY: 129/305 330 331 153/7715 154/10 218/840 220/70 226/17 30   
   SEEN-BY: 226/100 227/114 229/110 206 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 550   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/5832 250/5 8 266/512 267/800 282/1038 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 298/25 301/1 305/2 3 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 3 100 340 772/210 220 230   
   PATH: 770/100 1 317/3 229/426