TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A47   
   MSGID: 1:129/215 e5cb1e65   
   REPLY: 1:305/3 ec483545   
   TZUTC: -0400   
    SO> Emulation would work, but I dare suggest (cringing): You can use Syncterm   
    SO> which has PETSCII support if you want a down and dirty quick way to test   
    SO> it. I know that is sacrilege to suggest but it does. hehe   
      
   Hey there is nothing wrong with Syncterm, its a great terminal!   
      
   If Syncterm supports it I would use it to test with, but at some point it   
   needs to be put through the motions with actual hardware (if possible).  I   
   don't want to assume that Syncterm would be 100% perfect in its emulation   
   (although it very well could be).   
      
   Could you recommend a Windows C64 or C128 emulator and terminal software for   
   the Commodore that could be used to telnet into a Mystic BBS from the   
   emulator?  Does such a setup exist?  This would be my ideal testing platform   
   and then I can have someone on real hardware give it a shot once I think I   
   have it right.   
      
    SO> I would foresee PETSCII support making its way into Netrunner though as a   
    SO> result of Mystic offering PETSCII!! ;)   
      
   That wouldn't be out of the question, although NetRunner is my neglected child   
   so it could take a while lol   
      
   ... My tagline could eat your tagline for breakfast   
      
   --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/07/28 (Windows/64)   
    * Origin: Sector 7 * Mystic WHQ (1:129/215)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 457 616 123/10 131 124/5016   
   SEEN-BY: 129/215 305 154/10 30 40 50 700 203/0 220/80 90 221/0 6 226/18   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 201 702 229/101 310 424 426 428 452 550 700   
   SEEN-BY: 229/981 1016 1017 240/1120 5411 5824 5832 5853 6309 249/206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/307 317 400 280/464 5003 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 633/280 770/1 2452/250   
   SEEN-BY: 2454/119 3634/12   
   PATH: 129/215 154/10 280/464 240/5832 229/426