Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    MOVIES    |    Do you like movies about gladiators?    |    1,361 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 686 of 1,361    |
|    Roger Nelson to All    |
|    Uh-oh!    |
|    10 Jul 18 19:46:33    |
      AT&T's Troubling Plan to Change HBO               The telecom giant, which just acquired Time Warner, is seeking to drastically       change the premium-cable channel in order to compete with the likes of Netflix.       David Sims       Jul 9, 2018               HBO CEO Richard Plepler talks about HBO Now for Apple TV during an Apple event       in San Francisco.       AP / Eric Risberg               This past February, HBO added the most U.S. subscribers in its history,       boosting its user base by 11 percent (the company has some 142 million global       subscribers). The steady growth of the premium-cable and streaming service to       $6.3 billion in revenue last year helped power its parent company, Time       Warner, to $31.3 billion in revenue-a 7-percent overall jump despite dips in       other divisions. Since the telecom giant AT&T began its bid in 2016 to acquire       Time Warner, it came to be widely understood that HBO was one of the most       prized parts of the deal, which became official in June after a lengthy legal       battle.               The channel's stature is what makes it baffling to learn of reports that the       new Warner Media chief executive John Stankey recently lectured HBO employees       on the hard times ahead. In the eyes of Stankey, an AT&T veteran, HBO is       apparently too small, too nimble, and too boutique-ill-fitted for a media       world that's all about size. During a closed-door June 19 conversation with       some 150 HBO staff, "Stankey never uttered the word `Netflix,' but he did       suggest that HBO would have to become more like a streaming giant to thrive in       the new media landscape," reported The New York Times. That means aggressive       expansion, with a flood of new shows, to give HBO the kind of massive library       Netflix is currently building.               Netflix is a production company of peerless scale when it comes to TV. It's       projected to spend $12 to $13 billion on original programming in 2018;       meanwhile, HBO spent $2.5 billion on its shows in 2017. Netflix's strategy is       to overwhelm, pumping out fresh content at its subscribers and relying less       and less on licensed material it doesn't own. HBO has always had more of a       "prestige" bent, taking a very long time to develop its shows and launching       them with extreme fanfare, with an eye toward awards. But Stankey seems to       view that deliberate pace as a result of laziness, and his desire to upend the       network's careful approach to putting out new shows (it only makes a handful       per season) could mean the end of HBO as we know it.               "It's going to be a tough year," Stankey said the June meeting, according to a       recording the Times obtained. "It's going to be a lot of work to alter and       change direction a little bit." Expanding HBO's viewer base would require more       programming, released at a faster pace, well beyond the channel's rotating       Sunday night lineup that makes up the core of its original shows. "I want more       hours of engagement ... You get more data and information about a customer       that then allows you to do things like monetize through alternate models of       advertising as well as subscriptions, which I think is very important to play       in tomorrow's world," Stankey said.               HBO's current profit model is simple but effective. People pay a fee       (something like $15 a month) to subscribe; HBO uses that money to license       movies and produce TV for subscribers to watch. Because of the company's       longtime reputation for high-quality, Emmy-winning shows like Game of Thrones       and Big Little Lies, plenty of people subscribe, and HBO makes a lot of money.               Netflix's business approach, again, is about scale and is underwritten by       investors. The company has focused on getting more worldwide users and hiking       its subscription fee to increase revenues. But producing more original shows       means Netflix burns through more money-a March 2017 report found Netflix had a       negative free cash flow of $2.1 billion. A few months later, the company said       in a letter to shareholders that it would remain in the negative for years,       but that the investment would crucially help the company spread across the       globe.               As he assumes control at Warner Media, Stankey is correct in identifying HBO       as the company's only obvious Netflix rival. But the kind of staggering growth       he wants will necessarily disrupt the calculated approach to development that       has distinguished HBO for two decades. Due in part to the sheer quantity of       its output, Netflix has managed to greenlight some critical hits. But it has       not yet won an Emmy for best drama, comedy, or miniseries, while HBO still       rules the roost at awards season. The premium-cable network has put out shows       like The Sopranos, The Wire, Sex and the City, Deadwood, Six Feet Under, and       Veep that helped define the so-called "Golden Age of Television"-which is now       receding in the wake of Netflix's content deluge. In response, Stankey wants       HBO to become another titan in this era of streaming behemoths.               In this age, as Stankey made clear, "hours of engagement" are what matter       most. Executives have long factored viewing data extracted from subscribers       into their programming decisions, but online services can mine our viewing       preferences much more minutely. The more data, the easier it is to understand       what people want-at least that's been Netflix's guiding principle as it makes       hits like House of Cards and Stranger Things, which are calibrated to play on       audience nostalgia. But the idea that numbers alone will drive good or popular       art is ludicrous; Netflix has made plenty of shows that haven't hit the mark       with audiences, like any other network.               Stankey isn't the only executive worried about the rise of Netflix. Disney is       preparing to launch its own streaming service, and its proposed acquisition of       Fox would help fill out its library of properties. The future of media will       certainly revolve around subscription-based streaming services. But Netflix is       turning into a kind of broadcast-TV network: a big umbrella for lots of       different kinds of programming. Founded more than 45 years ago, HBO has long       been a challenge to broadcast television, staking its reputation on offering       something different. As the slogan went, it's not TV, it's HBO. Now, Stankey       wants to make it TV.                Why the Trump Administration Is Suing to Block the AT&T-Time Warner Merger        Derek Thompson                       Regards,               Roger              --- Klaatu barada Nickto        * Origin: NCS BBS -Houma, LoUiSiAna (1:3828/7)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca